White Wood

This was a decent effort but you needed to put some effort into supports and making a realistic ride!

Technical
Track was smooth throughout - however the shaping was a bit off in several places - and I felt better if you'd have executed a lot of this differently then your adrenaline would've been far better too. The turn over around the station was oddly shaped and banked and there were several instances throughout the track where the banking just didn't feel consistent.

Passed all the basics! Should've put the second train on for standard running however!

The ride completely lacked any custom supports. The lfit needed them, most of the turns needed them and all the crossovers needed some metal bracing to span the gap. This was the biggest hit to your technical score!

The terrain was alright - nothing special but did do the job!

Adrenaline
The pacing of the ride was pretty consistant- however the drawn out nature of the trackwork led to the ride feeling quite sluggish. I'#d recommend making everything a bit more snappy and tight considering the type of ride you appeared to be going for.

Force variety was pretty good too - you had a nice mix of airtime and the positives were varied and within comfortable levels. My main complaint here is the lack of good laterals - you seemed to auto bank the entire ride when if you'd have left it unbanked lsightly it would have been a much more fun ride!

The ride twisted around itself very well which I enjoyed. There could've perhaps been a few more headchoppers and stuff - especially if you'd put in custom supports for bracing.

Uniqueness
This ride had a pretty unique layout - although it did follow the standard setup of biug hills then twisted sections. I'd have liked to see some more airtime hill variety towards the end of the ride! Some kind of theming (even if you'd elaborated on the classic wooden coaster with some decent support style themeing)

Realism
The trackwork was alright for the most part - however the lift angle and drop angle were arguable reminiscent of RMC rides - however you did not portray the rest of the ride in this sort of style. For instance RMC fit airtime into every turn and do not have catwalks and your ride did neither of these things. There were no custom supports to speak of so this was not realistic. Scenery was pretty realistic but more effort would've improved your score.

The forces were realistic and within reasonable ranges but again I'd have liked to see more laterals which is very typical of a wooden ride. The unique twisty-ness of the ride felt within the realms of possibility and my main concern with the buildability is again the lacking supports and how the lfit and drop were done.

Feel free to PM me about this rate

hi there!

T - Very... drawn out turns and hills for the most part. The turns were a bit too twisty for a long time for this kind of wooden coaster but that doesn't mean it couldn't be done. Another thing that irked me was the lift and first drop. the first drop seemed almost too steep and the lift definitely was. The supports could have been a lot better seeing as there were a bit of areas that felt undersupported.

A - Kind of a slower paced ride, although with a nicely made layout.

U - I like the setting of the ride and the first drop. Made for an interesting ride experience

R - I don't see too many reasons this ride couldn't be made in real life other than the supports need a bit of work and the locale would need to be perfect.

RV - I felt the ride was a bit slow and with only one train running there were only so few people that could ride it. I know there was a second train but maybe you needed one more for storage and 2 on the track.

Interesting ride, keep building!