Originally posted by minicoopertx
I'm noticing a lot of posts that say "that pic isn't B&M like" or "my hills don't look like B&M hills"...
Is one of the main objectives to make a coaster that looks just like a B&M coaster, or is it just as valid to take a 4-across hyper and do things with it that B&M will probably never do, supported by supports that B&M would never build?
Will there be points off for something that isn't "B&M like" even if it adheres to all the rules? If so, I need to start over!
If it is POSSIBLE to build the elements you are putting on the coaster (whether or not B&M has used them yet), then adding new stuff is actually a plus in originality.