Bad Rate

http://coastercrazy.com/track_exchange/de ... p?tid=6460
Maybe he should have read the description more thoroughly, he apparently does not realise that the ride is a recreation and the designer is just stating that his version is accurate to the real one, probably would be best to just PM PumpMeUp and ask for him to re-rate the ride.

I think a decent addition to the site would be when you go to rate a re-creation, you are taken to a page where it tells that its a re-creation and that to rate it you should become familiar with the track via links within the description, etc. This might help alert people since its VERY clear that people never read the description. Only the veteran riders read that.

However, in this specific case, no where is it stated that its a "Re-Creation" but that the ride should pull certain g's and such.

oh yeah!! In the top corner it actually says it is a realistic coaster not a rec, so in that way it was his fault. I always read the description as vital information can nearly always be found there, stating things like why someone did this ect.If people didnt read my descriptions i would get terrible rates because of large G's, but i state that it is supposed to be like that as it is inspired by a traver coaster wih large G's ect.

I also think reals sugestion is a vey good one, there should be a page that comes up before rating saying it is a rec!