OK look, bud team, I am NOT (REPEAT NOT) singling you out but it is high time some people around here learn how to rate. Look at this rate:
Comment By bud team on 01/05/2005
This was good! very smooth and fun. All of the 3d work is very good to. keep up the hard work.
Technical: 8 Adrenaline: 7.5 Originality/Acc.: 8 Average: 7.83
http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_excha ... p?tid=6438
OK, now this one I am picking on. Look at the rating of taz1970 on my most recent track. Now, compare it to that of JPE or McFly. See a problem?
Comment By taz1970 on 01/05/2005
Well this was very good. But it was to short for me. The track has some problems, like not smooth and to short like i said lol. any way hope to see more from you.
Technical: 7 Adrenaline: 7.5 Originality/Acc.: 7 Average: 7.17
http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_excha ... p?tid=6432
What do those rates say? Why were points docked? What did they use to determine the score? What advice have they given to help the designer? This is typical of the rating around here (and other sites) and it is rediculous.
Now, let me be the first to say that I could care less about the scores (you gotta believe me), but when rating we should be pointed towards making the designer better and helping each other to improve, not rating with crap and hoping no one will notice.
Come on folks ... WE as a community can do better than this.