New Inverted Coaster

^Do you see any B&M inverts like this though? That's what he's pointing out. It's not the accurate style at this time.

Who ever said that this was a B&M invert in the first place?

[Coasterkidmwm]

You can really tell who is observant and who isn't in this thread lol.

[slosprint]

Originally posted by SkyLindlar

Your right slosprint,but you are also a tad wrong. The shaping is off in those pictures you posted, but as you can see in the picture that Vid_w posted, it doesn't dip down. So I think it is alright if Coasterkid keeps his lift the same.

Wait... What did i post?

^Everything...

No, actually he was talking to me (I think) but for some reason mixed you and me up... I take that as an insult... j/k

He's using B&M invert track.

Looks to me like a Giovanola with Katun's Drop.

Originally posted by griffonluv

He's using B&M invert track.

Oh, what is one supposed to use for a Giovanola Inverted coaster? The Giovanola Invert type that NoLimits obviously has?

It's the same type of track, just different trains. Smart guy.

http://www.rcdb.com/1169.htm?p=12239

Exactly! Just because the track is B&M like, doesn't mean that it isn't Givanola like. Of course, the trains will also be in a B&M style, as NoLimits doesn' hav that either. So you shouldn't say that it's a B&M when you don't know for a fact.

[Coasterkidmwm]

http://www.rcdb.com/1169.htm?p=12235
http://www.rcdb.com/5.htm?p=13875

Observant people will notice different ties and a possible tie to beam width ratio that is different.


Also sorry about the total lack of info and pictures I know I enjoy criticizing people for exactly what I'm doing currently and I'm surprised no one has called me out on it. Anyways the drop exists and a loop, after that I've made 5+ failed layouts so we'll see what happens.

Layout first THEN pictures...

[Metazoanhaddock]

Then why post the picture of the top of the lift in the first place? If you're going to post pictures, you might as well be well into the project... with at least a layout in mind. I personally draw my layouts by hand on paper before trying to build them, not try to build a layout as i go along....it saves a lot more time and prevents you from getting in a situation where you're criticized for posting one very uninformative picture.

[Coasterkidmwm]

Layouts on paper don't always work in real life lol. I have yet to learn that.

Originally posted by griffonluv

It's the same type of track, just different trains. Smart guy.

http://www.rcdb.com/1169.htm?p=12239

[lol] Oh my god you must be kidding.

Originally posted by GerstlCrazy

Originally posted by griffonluv

It's the same type of track, just different trains. Smart guy.

http://www.rcdb.com/1169.htm?p=12239

[lol] Oh my god you must be kidding.

Sure... It's not exactly the same, but pretty damn close.

Dude, don't worry 'bout it, you're not understanding me.

I pity the better half of the users in this thread :/

[Coasterkidmwm]

Image Insert:

47.61 KB

Well I've been attempting to make a helix oriented turnaround that is somewhat creative and I've done about as well as Flickstah's parents did at naming him. So it's still a lift, drop, and a vertical loop thus far. The sucker up there pulled about 5.5 vertical G's which ended up being a big oopsie.

That looks wicked! Too bad it had to pull out those g's. You should just make another one, except with larger radiuses.

I think we need pictures of what you actually did doofus.