Nonsense Rating

OK, BROK's rate has got to go ... and here is why:

The rate of my coaster is about as contradictory and unexplained as an all get out.

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=6432

Think about what is written:

First you say, "I did notice all those breaks on the ride which really did kill your adrenaline". Then you say, "it seems like it couldnt keep it's speed through the whole ride, and had to be trimed alot"

So, was it too fast or too slow?

But wait, then you say, "also there wasnt that much speed since it was trimed alot, which made a good layout a boring one"

I'm sorry man, but you do not know how to rate a coaster to save your life. You contradicted yourself 3 times, and did this on multiple sites, which is really not a good thing for you, bud. Your rate is unfair, and completely ambigious, not too mention unexplained.

And oh yes, then there is your final comment, "The originality of this coaster is average, it seems like it has been done before, but also the ending was really cool, good job on that." Now compare this to your first sentence ...

What? Was it original or not? Was it all done before or not? How much more original do you want a woodie? Perhaps through a burning bush or something next time?

Come on ... learn how to explain your rates or don't rate ... that was pretty bad.

ok fine, I will re-word, my self to make the rate more suitable to your liking

BROK has re-written the rating in plain english, and there is nothing wrong with it.