not to complain again but...

ok, i think javixxxxx is mad at me because of how i rated his last coster. i told him that his last ride was repetative and therefore got boring, he responded with an very nasty email with a bunch of swears. i thought he'd be over it by now. he gave my coaster, champion, a low rating. now, his rating was well explained but he kept saying the ride was "boring" and that that brought down my adrenaline. the other raters said the ride was awsome. he also said that some of my supports (wich took me nearly 50 hours to do) were "crap" when other raters said that they were "just beautiful" and "Must have been some work to do ". now, i dont know about you, but i am really getting sick of his bad ratings and his "rating module".

thanks in advance!

note: i thought he gave me a low score but i waited for more ratings to accuratly determine it

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=3291

i would have thouht you two guys could of settled this in your own time, rather than wasting the staffs time. Imo the coaster was rated fair...its not like its under-rated and at that, its even above average, so i really dont see why your complaining. And if this is all about medals anyway, competiton tracks cant win weekly medals...

[Oscar]

nor will the ratings of other users affect the outcome of the winner of the contest.

nor does this have anything to do with how cool wws is.

Back to the point, this has nothing to do with the forums or tracks, it is merely 2 immature people IMO fighting about a game.

There are always ratings problems with contest coasters. Just last year, a couple of the SFH2004 tracks were seriously bashed by the other competitiors. It's a hostile environment, but you just need to live with it. The contest coasters are inelligible for the weekly competition anyway, so just ignore the losers that waste their time downrating you, and focus on the only rating that counts to a contest coaster... GFA's.

Coaster922200 im not complaining about your last rrate, i just rate it like the track is it, have a good tech, but adrenaline , if you compare whit other coaster could be really really hight, and have some originals things, but not too. I think i rate it good, 8 tech , 5 adrenaline and 6.5 originality, cause adrenaline was not too god for a hyper

also, another person rated your coaster like me...

yeah, i noticed the other rate.. this pretty much evens up my ratings to two lower rates and two very high rates. i thought at first that javixxxxx was intentionally rating me below the average of the ratings because the others were so high, and since my coasters rarely get two ratings, nevermind four, i thought i should complain about it... sorry!

Yeah, javixx rated down one of my RCT2 coasters as well, partly because it "wasn't high enough!" http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=3226
What's that about? Everyone else liked it. Not every coaster should be a 200 foot monster... I guess he just has different priorities for what makes a good coaster.

i think he should rate a coaster for what he sees rather than for what it could have been like

RCTandy

Good coaster, but could be better again. THeme was ok, but could have more, try to build highest and bigger structures. The tracks dont start at the same time, and the brakes into this specie of big box are too long , and speed too low. Try to fix that

Overall, more than average coaster, but not too special.
Technical: 6.5 Adrenaline: 5.5 Originality/Acc.: 6.5 Average: 6.17

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>try to build highest and bigger structures

Not HIGHEST COASTER ??????????????????'

i mean its about supports, you could worked more

ah! coaster 992001 you must know that AVERAGE RATE WAS A 5 , not more

what?...pm me, we'll continue there

I think the whole rating system has been messed up (users fault, not wws). A 5 is average, not a 7. I think im gonna have to continue Shaggszgn's article soon.

Originally posted by Dj-Javixxxxx

RCTandy

Good coaster, but could be better again. THeme was ok, but could have more, try to build highest and bigger structures. The tracks dont start at the same time, and the brakes into this specie of big box are too long , and speed too low. Try to fix that

Overall, more than average coaster, but not too special.
Technical: 6.5 Adrenaline: 5.5 Originality/Acc.: 6.5 Average: 6.17

So basically, you rated down my 90-foot RCT corkscrew because it didn't have the supports of an NL giga coaster...the tracks don't start at the same time so as to synch the 8 dueling spots throughout the layout...and the brakes are like two sections long. Plus, you don't even PLAY RCT2. I think it's pretty obvious that you rated this down because you thought it was rated too high, and adjusted your personal rate to take down my overall rate. To me, that's no better than a spite vote of 1 or 0. I don't really care about my coaster, because the rating is still good, but if other people are having this problem as well, maybe dj javixx should be watched a little more closely. That's all I'm saying.

No, i dont rate down your coaster for this, just the layout could be better, the track is too short, small, and the brakes are too rought, also the duel dont begin at the same time

[irate] so knowone red what this forums is for?