Originally posted by Real
As far as Live vs Computer goes...I prefer live. I have been a PC gamer for nearly a decade and while its gotten better, it all depends on the server you hook up too. At least on Live it finds people with good connections and if not, they pretty much bomb out and you reset. Plus with Live if the host drops from the game, it reconfigures and you keep playing. Something servers for the PC cant do.
I think it was just my 6 years playing Counter-Strike that frustrated me with PC gaming but it worked.
As far as Live vs Computer goes...I prefer live. I have been a PC gamer for nearly a decade and while its gotten better, it all depends on the server you hook up too. At least on Live it finds people with good connections and if not, they pretty much bomb out and you reset. Plus with Live if the host drops from the game, it reconfigures and you keep playing. Something servers for the PC cant do.
I think it was just my 6 years playing Counter-Strike that frustrated me with PC gaming but it worked.
Bleh...Counter-Strike has and will always be full of hackers and people who think their internet connection is good. But I'm a big FPS fan and I'm sticking with PC cause I can get the same expierience from the Halo games. (UT2004 owns Halo)
almost all ingame footage of the ps3 has been "faked".. they were made by a graphics company (how cheap ). The Xbox 360 has shown some real ingame footage, gotto say damn it looked good. But i bet those HDTV thingies costed a lot .
Erm...whoever told you that was horribly wrong. All footage from the PS3 games were live action, not pre-rendered. Those games you saw (Metal Gear Solid 4, Killzone 2) were live action game-play. But I can assure anyone they are not coming out 2006!!! And if you've played the MGS series, you'd know they don't switch to pre-rendered graphics during cut-scenes.
I believe the all the consoles start off with good, but not the best in the graphics department (like...one step above the last console) until the developers get a hang of it.