Whos the dumbass? Do you even know me? Obviously not.
Heres a few quotes for you - right from here or from other posts on this site:
From the Cedar Point thread:
Originally posted by Real
Hence why no matter what they get, unless its small, tight and intense itll be a complete let down. How can you go bigger than what they have and still be original and fun? They have height, they have speed.
Yet I find it odd that two of their rides that CONSISTANTLY come up as a #1 favourite among people I know, Raptor and Mantis, are under 150ft.
Was I praising a large coaster or condemning it? What coasters did I praise? Exactly.
Im amazed that you guys get so, so upset that I make some speculations. Is there some law in the UK that one cannot speculate on a subject or entity? You guys sure make it seem as such.
But I will take it as a personal attack because you obviously arent mature enough to respect another persons opinion. Have you ever made an opinion of a ride youve never ridden? Im sure you have - so you are in the same boat as me there cheif.
Before you go sounding off on something why not read the context.
I dont need to ride a ride to know what and how its going to do what its doing. Every ride I rode last year rode just how everyone said and how I expected with a few being far better and some being far worse. But on the average I was very close with my assumptions.
Also, let me remind you that you know nothing about American rides. Heres a few facts:
1. Very few parks are located in areas hilly enough to compare to the UK.
2. The parks that do feature amazing rides:
---Hershey Park - Storm Runner, Great Bear, etc.
---Dollywood - Thunderhead
---Holiday World - All the rides
---SFMM - Tatsu and others but excluding the rides on the flatter portion
---Dorney Park - Hydra, Talon, Steel Force
---Silver Dollar City - Wild Fire, Powder Keg
---Busch Gardens Williamsburg - All the rides
---Busch Gardens Tampa - All the rides (Themed but on flat Florida soil)
---Lake Compounce - Boulderdash
I could keep going. You must mistake the United States for Antartica or something because there are plenty of awesome parks with awesome rides that are themed, terrained or both. Thats just a sampling.
But of course, its cheaper to build a ride on flat ground so is building in general so most park owners choose flatter plots of land. Plus its easier on guests to walk on flat planes rather than up and down hills. With all the land in the US its no wonder most parks sit on flat peices of land.
Every time I re-read your post Im more inclined to even ask you if you know what
www.rcdb.com is but I think you do. Its useful. Open it. Use it. Search all the rides I just listed.
And see how Ive been so much more civilized. Even after you completely stereotyped me without knowing I prefer smaller, most intense rides over large ones. Which could easily have been read multiple times over the past couple weeks in many threads.