Board index Public Relations Contests 2006 NL Tournament (Round 1) - RESULTS pg 58

2006 NL Tournament (Round 1) - RESULTS pg 58

Only official CoasterCrazy.com Contests are posted here.

Post March 9th, 2006, 1:26 am

Posts: 3185
Points on hand: 3,780.00 Points
Location: USA
Just to add to that, Premiers and Shwarty's also have seatbelts which are absent on the Beamer hypers.

Post March 9th, 2006, 2:26 am

Posts: 418
Points on hand: 2,601.00 Points

Woodie Man, try chiming in when you know what you're talking about.

SOME Schwarzkopf coasters have seat belts, but almost all of those exist because the PARK added them later. The coasters usually are built without them.

Premier seat belts? Perhaps, but not on any of the Premier coasters I've been on.
My body isn't a temple. It's an amusement park.

Post March 9th, 2006, 3:17 am
Pad

Posts: 601
Points on hand: 1,981.00 Points
Location: Bern, Switzerland

Originally posted by Woodie Man

Just to add to that, Premiers and Shwarty's also have seatbelts which are absent on the Beamer hypers.

Silverstar does actually have seatbelts... don't know about the other B&M hypers though.

Even if I personally wouldn't build one for such a contest, I think they would safely manage to go through a big vertical loop, no other inversions though.

Post March 9th, 2006, 6:40 am

Posts: 937
Points on hand: 829.00 Points
Location: Leeuwarden, Netherlands

stop complaining... those coasters use modified trains...

Post March 9th, 2006, 7:45 am

Posts: 2864
Points on hand: 4,152.00 Points
Location: Monroeville, PA, USA

Originally posted by Real

Im wondering CK why you didnt AHG the entire track? Im definatly expecting transition bumps with some of those changes in handle lengths even with it being Elementary.


I don't think that he heartlined it yet. Those big changes in vertex count are just from the formulas, and poor knowledge.

Post March 9th, 2006, 8:18 am

Posts: 5367
Points on hand: 1,916.00 Points
Location: San Antonio, Texas, USA

Originally posted by Jimmy Yoshi

Originally posted by CoAsTeRkRazY

well its pretty hard esspiclly if you wanna mess around with HSAK and bowfu bowdip like muah. it looks perfectly shaped from a top view too:)


Like you? Please, I taught you like all you know about that program, and your ride still looks crappy. ANd there's a little something I intentionaly forgot to tell you...


Golly oh gee, I hope you didn't forget to tell me something!

Post March 9th, 2006, 8:43 am

Posts: 937
Points on hand: 829.00 Points
Location: Leeuwarden, Netherlands


Post March 9th, 2006, 10:20 am

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
Originally posted by minicoopertx

Woodie Man, try chiming in when you know what you're talking about.

SOME Schwarzkopf coasters have seat belts, but almost all of those exist because the PARK added them later. The coasters usually are built without them.

Premier seat belts? Perhaps, but not on any of the Premier coasters I've been on.


Its not so much a seat belt but a belt from the train to the lap bar. Correct? Its still functioning as a seat belt - an extra level of protetion.

Its really apples to oranges. The way Schwartzy's and Premiere lock you in is in no way similar to that of a B&M Hyper coaster - period.

Post March 9th, 2006, 10:50 am
Dirk_Ermen User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 13387
Points on hand: 2,180.50 Points
Bank: 45,000.00 Points
Location: Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Originally posted by Pad

Originally posted by Woodie Man

Just to add to that, Premiers and Shwarty's also have seatbelts which are absent on the Beamer hypers.

Silverstar does actually have seatbelts... don't know about the other B&M hypers though.

Even if I personally wouldn't build one for such a contest, I think they would safely manage to go through a big vertical loop, no other inversions though.


silverstar with seatbelts? Since when?[confused] Or are those only in the front and backseat?
Coastercount: 1410 (I've seen the world and it's horrid contraptions... @.@)
- Wood: 142
- Steel: 1268

Post March 9th, 2006, 1:34 pm

Posts: 223
Points on hand: 2,539.00 Points
Location: Encinitas, CA, USA

Post March 9th, 2006, 2:54 pm

Posts: 125
Points on hand: 89.00 Points
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

When Arrow were working on the prototype Corkscrew they went for OTSRs so that people would 'feel' safer and they said lapbars would have been adequate. The swines. Schwarzkopf and the Sirocco incident also proved that. I guess OTSR's became standard though[:(!].
As for the B&M hyper's I personally don't see the need for inversions.

Post March 9th, 2006, 3:09 pm

Posts: 375
Points on hand: 79.00 Points

Post March 9th, 2006, 3:17 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
^a not-so-original helix in a original oase, i like it :)

and that road reminds of someting ;)
Image

Post March 9th, 2006, 3:33 pm
Sio User avatar

Posts: 3
Points on hand: 2,004.00 Points
Location: Paris, France

Post March 9th, 2006, 3:42 pm

Posts: 943
Points on hand: 1,843.00 Points
Location: United Kingdom

I managed to work faster than I expected, I'll probably have mine ready for upload later tonight. [:D]

Post March 9th, 2006, 4:21 pm
ish User avatar

Posts: 616
Points on hand: 1,239.00 Points
Location: Germany

Why aren't some people smart enough to read the rules. I've seen so much tracks getting disqualified for ignoring the 20 ft clearence rule. Why? Just why? Is it such a big deal to look at it from the side? I mean, it's sad that some got diqualified for that, although the track was really good:/

However, I'm not sure if I'm able to finish my track. I won't have much time untill saturday and I'm only halfway done with supports. Gonna be tough but I'll try!

Post March 9th, 2006, 4:25 pm

Posts: 943
Points on hand: 1,843.00 Points
Location: United Kingdom

Posted! [:D]

http://www.weeweeslap.com/track_exchange/detail.asp?tid=9662

I'm real proud of this coaster, it's definitely been the fastest I've ever made a ride of this quality.

Post March 9th, 2006, 4:48 pm

Posts: 2145
Points on hand: 3,189.00 Points
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Rolling coaster, i think your coaster looks pretty nice! Nice colours, too.

Post March 9th, 2006, 6:03 pm

Posts: 513
Points on hand: 643.00 Points
Location: Town of Bedford, New York, USA

Now I have to do supports... but this is it for now.

http://nldc.interfix.net/p1664

I have 5, 28 passenger trains, with dual stations for more guests per hour.

Post March 9th, 2006, 6:52 pm

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
^^^You have no idea how similar our rides are except I included a couple unique parts to mine. That and since its not an Elementary ride it doesnt have those crappy transitions from hills to turns where the radius doesnt stay constant :P

Sorry, its a huge pet peeve and why I still hand build.

None the less - best one uploaded yet.

Post March 9th, 2006, 6:56 pm

Posts: 1983
Points on hand: 3,285.00 Points

Finally, I thought you were tooling it Real. Thats good to hear. Hand building the ride gives you so much more control and you don't even need to think about formula's, you just "Do It". Theres no math in that! By the way, did you AHG your ride or do you heart line that yourself too.

Looks good drummerkid. You going to have to work flat out on those supports. [:)] I'm also nearly done, but I think Grav wont let me borrow his environment. Too bad.

Post March 9th, 2006, 7:01 pm

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
I only normally tool hills but for this ride I wanted to recreate those hills exactly. It would be a little hard to do with a tool because the radius is a little strange at the top. Wing Over is as close as Ive seen but his still arent sharp enough over the top.

This ride was hand built but smoothed with the smoother. So in essense you could say its tooled but really its all hand built. I went through 100 saves on my computer and countless other saves as I tweaked and retweaked every portion.

I do use the AHG but not until I know the track can handle it. I went with segments on this of 6ft which is really small.


I use the AHG because its impossible to recreate the type of heartlines you need for some elements and shapes by hand. You need too small of segments in order to do some elements. Especially for coasters with inversions but even for this I have a few turns which wouldnt have been possible to heartline by hand AND still keep the realistic feel to it.

I dont feel the Smoother or AHG are really "tooling" it since both require a decent input for an even greater output. However, I do have a system devised where I move pretty quickly and it all works out in the end.



At heart, almost all of my rides are 90-95% Hand built.



Originally posted by Matt

Heres some big screens from my ride. No more, No less.


I know where you got that enviro ;)

Post March 9th, 2006, 7:22 pm

Posts: 1674
Points on hand: 4,378.00 Points
Location: IA, USA


Post March 9th, 2006, 7:53 pm

Posts: 3018
Points on hand: 2,931.00 Points
Location: USA
Like you? Please, I taught you like all you know about that program, and your ride still looks crappy. ANd there's a little something I intentionaly forgot to tell you...


looks can be deciving my friend[^] and yea you did teach me basiclly that program. and the only reason it does look so called "crappy" is because you cant see some turns from side and front views

Post March 9th, 2006, 7:59 pm

Posts: 1674
Points on hand: 4,378.00 Points
Location: IA, USA

^no, it is crappy because the track is crappy. its not horrible, just alot of pumping in it.

PreviousNext

Return to Contests

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post