Originally posted by Real
I disagree. Almost all of your high inversion high element rides are under 160ft.
All of your really long, really high rides are for the most part out and back Hyper coasters. Which, theres nothing wrong with that at all. Its my favourite type but I think anything over 250ft, like MF, actually limits you because of a few reasons.
1. Money - the costs of a ride this size are massive. Mf was 25 mil and its really nothing more than a large lift, 2 medium sized hills and a few overbanks. Nothing special.
2. G Forces - In order to keep the G's down on a ride going 90mph you need large radii and leadin's/outs. This increases the overall length of the ride which increases the cost and increases the size plot needed.
3. Along with the G Forces being kept down it limits your elements as well because alot of the elements we love on steel loopers actually work best in smaller sizes. I believe that most elements have a "effective" range in size where too small and they lose their specific purpose and too large as well. A 200ft loop would be a bore compared to a 80ft loop. Why? Because it would be impossible to recreate the feeling of the 80ft loop in the 200ft.
You can make more happen in a larger ride but theres actually more factors working against you when you think about it. Look at Colossus at Thorpe. Its what, like 130ft tall? And it holds the inversion record.
Heh, you beat me too it.
I'm guessing that it's going to be launched then or something that hasn't been done before, judging from that quote.