bright pulse**NL

Ok, im working on a coaster and it will be updated in a week or earlier =)
here some stats:

**Top speed: 93 km p/h
**Height: 73M
**Lenght: 1138.27
**trains: 3
**cars per train: 6
**positive G's: 4.7
**negative G's: -0.5
**lateral G's: 1.3

and here some pics ,, tell me what u think of it =D[8D]






^^dont hit the thing its only stuck to getter for extra supporting =P^^


ull see this thing faster if its loaded=)


and if u wanna see more ride and rate it as soon its uploaded =)[:D]

The layout is good... but the exceed on prefab. support down the quality of the coaster... create you personality supports [;)]

ok thnx
but i cant make supports by my own..
if i make it it dont look like a real coaster
i try to make the same as a real coaster but i just cant

any1 tell me what u think of this support
im so bad at supporting[xx(]

[hyyyper]

the supports are good, but i you want a more b&m style:

remove the lower lateral beam and make one side of the supports directly downwards under the track and the other side a greater angle (thus futher away)

haal de laagste schuine palen weg en maak een kant van de supports direct naar beneden onder de baan en de andere kant van de supports een grotere hoek geven (dus verder weg plaatsen)

Originally posted by hyyyper

the supports are good, but i you want a more b&m style:

remove the lower lateral beam and make one side of the supports directly downwards under the track and the other side a greater angle (thus futher away)

haal de laagste schuine palen weg en maak een kant van de supports direct naar beneden onder de baan en de andere kant van de supports een grotere hoek geven (dus verder weg plaatsen)

hebje een plaatje met een voorbeeld?
dat is wat makkelijker voor me[:)]

Or anyone else got a picture of what Hyyyper is saying so i can understand it a little better.
its easyer if i see it then someone tells it[:D]

[hyyyper]

http://www.rcdb.com/installationresult. ... &model=124
http://www.rcdb.com/installationresult. ... &model=125

Originally posted by hyyyper

http://www.rcdb.com/installationresult.htm?column=1,10,3,4,5&order=1,2&model=124
http://www.rcdb.com/installationresult. ... &model=125

oke Thnx =D
ill show my picture when im done
maybe u wanna say if its better =)

im done =)



^^^this is how it look like what i did first^^^



and this is with thinner support only the lowest not yet
bequese maybe i take the other support back
what do u think look the best?

I think the top one looks best, the other supports are too thin. Also, try changing the chain guide under the track and the crossbeams supporting it to I beams, they looks more realistic than a round beam. Look at this, for example: http://www.rcdb.com/ig94.htm?picture=3

Originally posted by Wing-Over

I think the top one looks best, the other supports are too thin. Also, try changing the chain guide under the track and the crossbeams supporting it to I beams, they looks more realistic than a round beam. Look at this, for example: http://www.rcdb.com/ig94.htm?picture=3

ok ill show u picture later[:)]

[hyyyper]

looks good, make sure the lift return tube starts at the end of the lift hill segments and not on the bottom of the pre-drop

ok =)
and now here u can see this is better too now=)
im getting better at the supporting now =D

Before:

^CLick for larger pic^

after:


i think its better now what u think?
(dont know if hard hat area is still the right forum for this but ok)[:p]

poop!!



i was working on smoothing this part out
but then it keep getting worser
and i could fix it anymore
i dont get it good
shall i still upload this track?
i worked pretty much on this track
but just cant fix that spot

( i collered the other things so u dont know the whole track before i upload it)(if i upload it then)

[hyyyper]

i some section gets screwed up, connect the track, set the node after the screwup 'first vertex' and then disconnect and delele the screwed of part and rebuild it

EDIT: btw, NEVER EVER make support on the top of an inversion, it doesn't look right on b&m's