Lowered Rating Out of Spite

[SauronHimself]

Rating given by master_of_hardcore:
"@cmichdude and SauronHimself
you way overrated this track especialy for someone only member just one day.

flangs are prob auto-generated and the ride did had a lot of pumps.
track is at some moments under supported.
and imo the track is way too high above the ground.
if you ask me Cmichdude is just a second accont from SauronHimself just to raise his track score.

now my rating:
Tec:
track is pumpy at the transtions and like i said the track is under supported.
and the fact that the brakrun is to far away from the station

Adr:
the adrenaline on this track is low not really high because its so high above the ground. the only thing that boosted you rate is the upward launch.

Or:
like i mention on the Adr part the only thing good is the upward launch the rest of the layout is just standard intamin trackwork."

PM sent to master_of_hardcore:
"For someone who predominantly makes woodies that pump frequently you sure know what it takes to build an Intamin steel hyper.

A friend of mine works for Intamin as a coaster designer, and after sending him the Cocidius track file, he was rather impressed and found very little wrong with it. His only beef was the fact that I used two sets of LIMs on the launch hill instead of one, but other than that he didn't have complaints. Neither myself nor he found any pumps in the track, and we did the obvious back-seat testing to verify that. Plus, the track was not hand made or done via FVD or AHG. It was created from Newton, and anyone who uses that program knows that any track it produces will contain zero pumps.

So after reading your review, I copied it and IM'ed it to my friend about ten minutes ago, and as I'm writing this, he's still going on about how your rating couldn't be further from the truth. I just thought you might be interested in that little tidbit."

The fact of the matter is that his rating was not technically accurate. I understand that opinion plays a role in ratings, but in any field of work or pleasure, your opinion is meaningless unless it contains technical accuracy to the item in question. His ratings was not in tune with how my ride was designed. The comments he made came down to two main ideas:
1. They were not technically accurate.
2. They regarded things that are completely arbitrary(i.e. adrenaline and height of track)

Reply sent from master_of_hardcore:
"i chanced my rating its now even lower [:D][:D][:D][:D].
whehehehehehe"


*Update*
This is a PM master_of_hardcore just sent me:
" Sent - 11/21/2008 : 3:24:00 PM View Profile Email Poster Reply with Quote Click to see 's MSN Messenger address [Click the image to enlarge]
Sauronhimself made a second account to rate up his track.
http://coastercrazy.com/track_exchange/ ... ?tid=14741
proof your asking???
look at the regdat of Cmichdude. and look from that point on the download list no Cmichdude to been seen.


a nice peace Forensic science ain't it."

The subject of the PM is "i made a topic specially for you".
The picture is missing, but the moderators have most likely seen it.

*Another PM just sent to me:*
"i think the topic start is a challenge [approve][approve][approve][approve]"

I think it's clear at this point that he is doing what 15-year-old males do best--badgering people just for the fun of it.

*Update 2*
Another PM just sent to me by master_of_hardcore entitled "please one reaction on my foundings":
"so [pdie]"

[Oscar]

say what!?