Originally posted by alton_
Why don't you just ignore Busters post then?^
he acctually posted that before i seen it and posted my reply.
Originally posted by Buster
cjd, please understand that me quitting has nothing to do with you. It has to do with gazag only.
There's one thing I can't stand and that's judges that bend their own rules. When I saw that ragan got thrown out allthough he had a legit track and at the same time read that gazag let a couple of otherwise DQed tracks slip through, my decision was set.
You geting through with your second submission (allthough that was clearly not allowed according to the rules - yes, it's in the rules) is only one little part of it. If I had the problem of high lats, I probably would have done the same as you, I can't hold that against you. But if the judge wants to keep any credibility (of the little that's left) he should have DQed you. He then could have filled up to 32 and maybe let you through again, but only after all legit tracks are through - and that includes ragans masterpiece.
Gazag wrote: "No one likes a smart ass". Well, I'd hope to never see a sentence like that from a judge again.
Gazag, YOU may not like it, but please don't speak for everyone. I for one applaud ragan for this ingenius approach. He found an easy way to follow every single rule. If you don't like that, then you should put more effort into your rules. Don't blame others for your very own shortcomings - like you also did when you threatened to throw people out because YOU lost their tracks.
Numerous people offered you help and you got constructive criticism over and over. You decided to not listen.
Why do you say that rating will take 2 weeks and then decide to make a lazy job and give minimal feedback to those that were DQed and those that you just decided to throw out and NONE to those that came through? Why don't you use those two weeks you have and at least TRY to make a good job? And please don't cover behind your dyslexia all the time, the wrong spelling is only a small thing (where spellcheckers would help), but the other issues have way more weight.
So there you have it.
sorry but i dont see there to be problems with the tracks i put throught, i did state from the start that the first round would be minimal feed back.
"Numerous people offered you help and you got constructive criticism over and over. You decided to not listen." 1 person did that and failed to get in contact
"And please don't cover behind your dyslexia all the time, the wrong spelling is only a small thing" ive only ever apologiesed for my misspellings, never acctually used it to cover up anything else
and as for the rest of what you said i accept reponcibility and deeply appologise and hope in some way you can forgive me. im still on a learing curve with the contest and the first round was a rushed thing as there was a big need for this to come back quickly and i appologise for that. i deeply appologise to ragen for what i did and what i said. i hope he can especially appologise for what i did.
1 other thing is either we can continue to round 2 or if you all like i would be willing to start over if you all can forgive me. round one will be the first round and you would all still be in pairs but we shall start over if you all wish to.
please everyone forgive me for being a total nob. i just hope you all hav it in your hearts to do so.