Originally posted by Jimmy Yoshi
Unless you live in the Love Canal or something, your tap water won't have nearly enough dangerous chemicals to cause any significant bodily harm. The amount of fluoride in the water is not enough to cause negative effects, unless someone chugs water all day out of a faucet.
I don't disagree with this at all. I just would rather not ingest fluoridated water as fluoride has shown to be harmful, even if it is only in much larger amounts. I see the
potential risks of it as greater than the potential upside. If you or anyone else doesn't see a problem with fluoride in tap water, I not only can see why you think that but half-agree about it also. Personally, however, I do not want to drink fluoridated water.
Originally posted by Coasterkidmwm
Please explain "chemicals and how much they have "f**ked up this world" to everyone since you really know what you're talking about.
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/67211.phphttp://lungdiseases.about.com/od/asthma ... nemist.htmThe fact that there are so many chemicals considered safe by the FDA, then later proven to be harmful just shows how out of all the chemicals out there, there have to be quite a bit of them that are harmful and we don't even know about it yet because not enough testing has been done.
Originally posted by Real
Well IF397 its clear to see that you have done all this testing in your basement. I sincerely apologize for questioning your expertise in this, as well as all areas.
Please. This is a debate on an internet forum, not a place to sarcastically make yourself look superior than others. I merely contributed my view on the issue as well as you and Coasterkidmwm did. Apparently, since I disagreed with you and Coasterkidmwm, that means that I think I know everything. Don't disagree with Real or Coasterkidmwm, or else you're a know-it-all!
Originally posted by Real
Quoted from video sequence:
"We tested a few popular brands of bottled water, and tap water from our own Studio 1A sink, and from 30 Rock, and Burbank, California."
Another quote:
"and while we did find chlorine by-products in the tap water and in some bottled water, they are not at high levels at all"
"Purified water can also be municipal water thats been cleaned, through a carbon filter or through distilling. Tests still showed that these still had chlorine by-products in them"
"People who drink only bottled water should consider fluoridated water"
1st quote: I read the article, not the video. Regardless, it would take tests from many areas of the US to determine the quality of tap water nationwide. 3 sources of tap water doesn't cut it.
2nd: Of course they aren't, never said they were.
3rd: This one seems rather biased. They say that water that has been filtered through common filtering methods still have chlorine by-products in them. Never did they mention reverse osmosis. I previously mentioned "Reverse Osmosis filtering is the ONLY filtering method for water that gets rid of just about all, if not all impurities."
4th: They are flat out saying that bottled water doesn't have fluoride, or at the very least has a significant less amount than tap water. How is this helping your point at all?
Originally posted by Real
But what do these people know? They are just experts in their fields. They cant know everything like a 17 year old.
Nice flame. What a low comment. I suspect the only reason you might have added that in there, is because you felt your argument wasn't good enough without adding something irrelevant to make you look better? I don't know why I even bothered to quote such filth.