Originally posted by CalawayPark
A coaster's not a painting but an aesthetically pleasing coaster is a hell of a lot better than an unpainted piece of crap with a station made of a tarp and some old fence posts. It's not just made for thrill, if coaster's didn't look nice, parks wouldn't have the same atmosphere.
And the NMR thing looks good, but do you have any idea how hard it will be for you to do that?
Well.. good luck.. I guess..
I'm putting a lot of time and effort into every aspect of this coaster. And it's not very hard to make a coaster both realistic and aesthetically pleasing...
Originally posted by hyyyper
2 major differences between the NMR and IF397's ride:
1. NMR has got 'pillars' on the paths, IF397 can't place any support on the paths, and thus the span will be huge.
2. NMR hasn't got wide structures, they go straight down, or has one level of extended supports. IF397's ride will have to withen the supports all the way to the edge of the path, which IMO will look unrealistic and silly.
1. The span may be large, but making realistic supports that could hold up the track over those paths is very doable.
2. You'll see how it will look when it's finished. [;)] I think it will look quite different than what you expect.
Originally posted by Coasterkidmwm
Intaminfan, where are the rides you're building over like Cornball? Oh wait you can't build over rides, my bad.
Where in the rules does it say the red lines are the only areas that rides can be in the park?