Originally posted by WeeWeeSlap
screw you and your video games beans. Time for you to grow up a bit don't you think? [;)]
Well I don't know what growing up has to do with the way I spend my spare time, so your demand is completely unreasonable as such I shall ignore it.
Really, though, it's not just video games. It's movies, tv, music, maybe even books too(probably comic books, I can't see a 400 page piece of literature really being affected as much). But I believe that anything she deems "innappropriate" for children will be attacked. She's not a supporter of free speech or expression, and if that's the case she shouldn't be given that power to control such things.
But maybe it's just me. Maybe I just enjoy a good story more then most people and I can appreciate a game for being more then just running and gunning (as most games have proven to have much deeper plots and stories in recent years) and I don't think it's fair for some one Hilary to try and censor and make the story teller pay extra just because she doesn't want kids to be tramatized, or w/e. And maybe I can just appreciate Tupac's music because it tells a story about lifestyles, and fears, and other things that many people who grow up in poor communities deal with. Besides, its shouldn't even be her concern. It's parents concerns on how to raise their kids or how they're not going to raise them.. just because I was raised just fine and the Spears family is ****ed up doesn't mean that I have to suffer. You're always going to have **** ups in life, but that is just something we're going to have to deal with it.
If you look on her page one of the ideas or agenda's she wants to push for is protecting children from violence in the media.
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/family/
As already stated, it is my firm belief that it is none of her business trying to help raise people's kids and in return putting restrictions on everyone else, despite thier age. A rumor I've seen on several sites like
this one
and
this one is that Hilary is planning on putting a tax on video games deemed "violent." And while there is support from both sides as noted on
this site, she is the only Presidential candidate at the moment who has made it clear about thier stance on violence as well as sex in video games, and various other media sources. And there is no doubt in my mind that if she has her way with video games, music and movies will be the next issue she will address, and possibly followed by liturature, maybe not all as I noted, but some of the forms literature comes in. And lets face it, the media is a very big part of everyone's life. You participate in some sort of media type on a regular basis. But are you willing to let some one tamper with it?
Maybe it's just because that is an aspect of life that directly affects me, and maybe that's why I have strong opinions of it, but I'm not willing to let some one else's opinions ruin my lifestyle or my spare time hobbies. Next thing you know, she's going to start taxing sports like paintball or just simple archery just because it teaches kids to shoot things.
Really when it comes down to it, she doesn't even seem like a good leader, on the contrary Oboma seems like a very intelligent man, very outspoken and thus far he has displayed, to me at least, characteristics that would make a good leader. If any democrat runs the white house for the next 4 - 8 years, I hope its him. He seems the most capable out of every one.
Also, if you vote for Clinton just because you liked the previous Clinton, you're a fool. Just because they are joined by marriage does not mean their personality or politics are the same. They're completely different people and as such they should be treated as completely different people.