This shall be my last opposing argument to my disqualification.
I would like to share four pictures with you
(Nothing has been done in any way to modify my ride to show you these pictures. You can do it if you like to. I moved the snap to .5 feet which allowed me to exactly mark 20 feet with the blue boundry line.
Picture one:
This picture shows my supports with nodes, but do realize that the only place on the node where the supports are connecting is the center line, which is not intersected into the blue line. This shows the two lines are parallel. (support line and boundry line) meaning that the support line must be below 20 feet.
Picture 2:
This shows the support line and boundry lines with there nodes zoomed in even farther. (using the paint application). This picture shows a very little separation between the red and blue lines, meaning that there is no connection other than the part of the support node that is not involved with the connection of the support.
Picture 3:
This picture shows the setting under the display menu where you can change whether the free nodes appear or not. No nodes have been deleted, they are just being hidden for better viewing purposes. This shows that the red and blue lines are exactly parallel, meaning also there is not interception breaking 20 feet.
Picture 4:
Last, this picture is of the support and boundary line with their nodes being hidden. Again, as you can see, there is no interception whatsoever. They are exactly parallel.
This is my last attempt to prove my DQ unfair. I will not attempt to agrue any more.