Board index Theme Park Discussions General Theme Park Discussions Evacuation Goes Wrong

Evacuation Goes Wrong

Discuss anything related to theme parks in general.

Post August 19th, 2007, 11:23 am

Posts: 2864
Points on hand: 4,152.00 Points
Location: Monroeville, PA, USA


Post August 19th, 2007, 11:34 am
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
Originally posted by tmv8888

ya but in a situation like this one where the train rest on a very teter-tottered center of gravity, you should start from the front. Wether the people freak out or not is irrelevent. Saftey comes first and this jacka** who did the evac should have taken physics in highschool.


doesn't matter, even if the train is halten at any place other than the bottom of a dip or brakes, you should ALLWAYS lock the train. And then you can evacuate in which order you want to
Image

Post August 19th, 2007, 11:40 am

Posts: 1140
Points on hand: 4,530.00 Points
Location: Lancaster, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
yeah, im no engineer but i think the train should always be strapped down just so it doesn't randomly start moving, as it did in this case.

Post August 19th, 2007, 11:44 am

Posts: 2052
Points on hand: 4,906.00 Points
Location: USA


Post April 7th, 2008, 12:56 am

Posts: 1
Points on hand: 1,551.00 Points

Post May 20th, 2008, 12:36 am

Posts: 28
Points on hand: 1,770.00 Points
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
It GREATLY depends on the ride you're evacuating from. In a case like that, where a train is on a conventional lift hill, as a rule it's from the front. Not only will it save someone from getting potentially serious injuries (Not to mention the infamous pink slip) but the people who are higher will get to safety first. Yes it takes longer in some cases but would you REALLY Sacrifice safety for TIME?


Some coasters evacuate from the back though..
Proud to be a...
Christian

Concert Band Flute Player.

Post May 20th, 2008, 8:59 am

Posts: 881
Points on hand: 2,481.00 Points
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA

wow [shocked] that mustve been scary!!
Founder of the (Un-Official) Site Welcoming Crew --- I'M CUCKOO FOR COASTERCRAZY!!!

Post May 20th, 2008, 9:12 am
Gav User avatar

Posts: 928
Points on hand: 2,076.00 Points
Location: Zwijndrecht, Netherlands


Post May 21st, 2008, 1:21 pm

Posts: 1605
Points on hand: 3,805.00 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
Location: UK
even i, who suggested windmills at the side of coasters to generate power am not as retarded as see that a train is tottering over the edge and see that is is balanced by the people at the back, would not load from the back. especially if it was for the reason that "we were told to." it's just plain retarded, the guys who did that should be shot, hung by the feet then quartered, then those pieces quartered again, just for good measure.
Cradled by two loving arms that I'd die for,
One little kiss and Felina goodbye.

Post May 21st, 2008, 1:41 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
Originally posted by Rocket Rodder

It GREATLY depends on the ride you're evacuating from. In a case like that, where a train is on a conventional lift hill, as a rule it's from the front. Not only will it save someone from getting potentially serious injuries (Not to mention the infamous pink slip) but the people who are higher will get to safety first. Yes it takes longer in some cases but would you REALLY Sacrifice safety for TIME?


Some coasters evacuate from the back though..


Dude, you are WRONG. It doesn't matter in which way you evacuate. That's not when went wrong here. They should've locked the train onto the track. That's what went wrong. If you lock your train onto the track it will not move and thus it doesn't matter from which way you unload.

The reason why parks unloaded stranded train from the back has nothing to do with gravity.
Image

Post May 21st, 2008, 1:54 pm

Posts: 881
Points on hand: 2,481.00 Points
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA

Originally posted by tmv8888

Saftey comes first and this jacka** who did the evac should have taken physics in highschool.

Not to sound mean, but most people that work at amusement parks are either teenagers or people that dropped out of high school... so maybe the guy was a dropout and was too stupid to take physics... [approve]

Originally posted by SMer

thank god it wasn't a hyper

o ya... i dont wanna imagine what the hell THAT would be like... [:O]

maybe something like this...?? [peakhill]...AHH!! *crash*[xx(]

Originally posted by hyyyper

They should've locked the train onto the track.


ive got a stupid question about this... ive never seen a train "locked" to the tracks before so i was kinda wondering how you would do that... is there a lever of some sort that locks the wheels?? or is there a different way to do it????[confused]
Founder of the (Un-Official) Site Welcoming Crew --- I'M CUCKOO FOR COASTERCRAZY!!!

Post May 21st, 2008, 3:00 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
^I don't know the english slang for it, but some sort of clamps that you tighted on the track to block the wheels.
Image

Post May 21st, 2008, 4:12 pm

Posts: 881
Points on hand: 2,481.00 Points
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA

o, ok i get it... btw i think theyre just called clamps?? [dunno]
Founder of the (Un-Official) Site Welcoming Crew --- I'M CUCKOO FOR COASTERCRAZY!!!

Post May 21st, 2008, 5:16 pm

Posts: 5626
Points on hand: 5,993.00 Points
Location: Millbrook, Alabama, USA

Originally posted by SixFlagsFiesta

Rocket Rodder,

.... I hope you do not work for an amusement park, because you could get someone killed with the attitude that time is greater than safety.
Uh, that is not what he said, bud.

Originally posted by RocketRodder

Yes it takes longer in some cases but would you REALLY Sacrifice safety for TIME?
Regardless of how he got there, his intention I believe was right that safety is more important.
Sometimes the best thing to say is nothing at all.

Post May 21st, 2008, 6:50 pm
Coasterkidmwm User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 12283
Points on hand: 8,049.10 Points
Bank: 15,000.00 Points
Location: Illinois, USA
I remember them chaining the Demon train to the tracks when it stopped in the loop.
"Careful man, there's a beverage here!"

Post May 22nd, 2008, 4:27 pm

Posts: 200
Points on hand: 1,117.00 Points
Location: Lobith, Gelderland, Netherlands

Originally posted by SixFlagsFiesta

You always unload back to front because you always follow rule number 1, Never unload if any part of the train is past the level point of the lift, that way you don't do what those idiots did unloading from the front.


I think that what you said here argues with the laws of gravity, when you unload back to front when the train is past the highest point the last piece of the train will become lighter than the front... causing it to gain more levitational force on the front end, and crest the top making the train work his way around the track. Think about it as in a scale. When one side is havier then the other side, that side will be pushed down harder by gravity. This would also happen to the front end of a train when you unload from back to front on the top of a lifthill.

However, still it was a wrong evac procedure. This does not may happen. But yeah last year was not exactly the greatest year for ''de Efteling''. With ''De Vliegende Hollander'' having so much breakdowns.

Post May 22nd, 2008, 4:56 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
^Max, you are forgetting one thing. In a good evac. procedure the train is locked multiple ways onto the track. Gravity and kinetic energy are in that way out of the equation.

Unloading without the track locked in place is extremely dangerous, wether you unload front to back or the other way around. Unloading a train that can move is playing with fire.

The mistake during this evac was simply the locking of the train.
Image

Post May 22nd, 2008, 5:09 pm

Posts: 200
Points on hand: 1,117.00 Points
Location: Lobith, Gelderland, Netherlands

^hyyyper I did not take that in question I just wanted to make clear what was wrong with SixFlagsFiesta's argumentation.

Post May 22nd, 2008, 5:25 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
^There is nothing wrong with his argumentation. His argument is based on the fact that during a regular evac, the train is secured.
Image

Post May 22nd, 2008, 6:25 pm

Posts: 604
Points on hand: 1,495.00 Points
Location: Plano, TX, USA
yea i saw this video previously, but that is really horrible.

Post May 22nd, 2008, 6:59 pm
Coasterkidmwm User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 12283
Points on hand: 8,049.10 Points
Bank: 15,000.00 Points
Location: Illinois, USA
WELCOME TO THE AMATEUR PHYSICS DEBATE!

The Amateur Physics Debate is the debate where people who haven't taken physics or operated a roller coaster before decide they know what's best!
"Careful man, there's a beverage here!"

Post May 23rd, 2008, 2:11 am
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands

Post May 23rd, 2008, 7:25 pm
Coasterkidmwm User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 12283
Points on hand: 8,049.10 Points
Bank: 15,000.00 Points
Location: Illinois, USA
That wasn't directed at you...
"Careful man, there's a beverage here!"

Post May 23rd, 2008, 8:19 pm
Turbo User avatar
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 3771
Points on hand: 5,516.00 Points
Bank: 21,857.68 Points
Location: WA, USA

That would suck so much...
Coaster Count: 582 // Top Five: 1. Helix 2. Nemesis 3. Big Bad Wolf 4. Boulder Dash 5. Balder

Coasterkidmwm wrote:
4 G's to the taint was a bit much for me because I'm not a power bottom like Turbo

Post May 25th, 2008, 5:25 pm

Posts: 28
Points on hand: 1,770.00 Points
Location: Los Angeles, California, USA
Originally posted by SixFlagsFiesta

I wouldn't recommend wheel chocks alone, they can slip as most are not designed with unload from hell in mind. My preferred method is to take ratchet straps and attach them to a fix point on the car, and to the cross rail on the track. Than every few cars another strap is brought across the coupler and around each rail. Use chains to secure it vertically.

Rocket Rodder,

You always unload back to front because you always follow rule number 1, Never unload if any part of the train is past the level point of the lift, that way you don't do what those idiots did unloading from the front. You also do it because you have to escort people down and people can start to panic and grab other guest as they are descending. Time is of no matter because it takes the same amount of time unloaded back to front, as it does front to back. I hope you do not work for an amusement park, because you could get someone killed with the attitude that time is greater than safety.



Ah, I see! I also saw your other quote about retracting your other statement, so thanks, that was very refreshing. All it was was a misunderstanding A really really bad one on my part [:I] , but.. yeah. =) Yet. And SFF, I do work at an amusement park. =)

*EDIT*

I don't know what I was thinking when I posted that very first comment, of course it makes sense now.. The lowest point first! @_@ But I've never heard of clamps, though.
Proud to be a...
Christian

Concert Band Flute Player.

Previous

Return to General Theme Park Discussions

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post