Is this element a fail?

Okay, so Flickstah and me have been arguing that the following element would be painful to ride, and is not like B&M to do.

The element is on CokeZero's Waterworld:



Now, the element is taken at 8mph in the front car, and 11mph in the back car, and yet gives of a painful -0.1 lateral g in the rear car.

Would B&M do something like this? And, according to the laterals, would it be "painful" to ride?

The trackwork was done by Coasterkidmwm, whom I believe to know what he is doing.

[Coasterkidmwm]

Seriously?

Wow. Just wow is all I have to say to you bobbyjo. Btw, real mature of you to block me, and then resort to actually making a topic about our argument. Real mature buddy.

You know what, i don't give a damn flickstah. You want immature, see coasterkidmwm.

^ Lol, your too funny to listen to. I think pathetic would be a compliment for you.

[Oscar]

FIGHT FIGHT!!!

[Coasterkidmwm]

I'm not inviting you to my birthday party! BAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

Originally posted by Flickstah

^ Lol, your too funny to listen to. I think pathetic would be a compliment for you.

This from the person whose parents are so stupid that they picked a first name from native americans?

You do realize the equivalent would be if you were named Laqueesha and was white.

^ Lol. Ok Ckid, whatever. At least I wasn't an inbred child.

Wow, you two are just sad...

The element looks fine. As for the topic....

[Coasterkidmwm]

Hey Flickstah check out Iron Wolf's drop. /me wins

I'm pretty sure that Iron Wolf's drop doesn't jerk like that. But whatever, I'm going to stop arguing about this because 1. It's an extremely stupid topic to argue about, and it has escalated to something that is completely unreasonable, and 2. It's stupid to argue with both of you because of the immaturity levels involved. I've said my piece, and I am most likely not going to respond to this topic again. Go ahead and make a comeback, but it's quite pointless.

The pull in of the drop looks just fine. You're not going fast enough for it to really matter...

can't you just extend it so the corner is bank all the way and the transition is localised to minimise lateral Gs?

What do you call this?



Doesn't hurt in the back!

Heres my take after looking at it myself in the editor.

The only reason its a jerk is because the back handle of the highlighted node isnt touching the imaginary perpendicular line created by the lift hill. Its literally .5 of a foot from having a lead in. As it stands, it has no lead in. So techincally, B&M more than likely wouldnt design without a lead.

However, its a minor thing to argue or bring up because if the G's are that good because of the speed, it doesnt matter.


Kyle - Thats a different style coaster and that whole turning drop only looks like that because its heartlined to 1.3m. So the shaping is perfect, as it virtually always is on a B&M.

[Coasterkidmwm]

Yeah I was wondering why nobody pointed out that the lifthill isn't straight lol.

Originally posted by Flickstah

^ Lol. Ok Ckid, whatever. At least I wasn't an inbred child.

I have nothing to do with this argument and yet, I was made fun of. This is becomming a pattern. I'm going to tell my mommy/auntie on you guys!

Originally posted by Spongemonkey74

Originally posted by Flickstah

^ Lol. Ok Ckid, whatever. At least I wasn't an inbred child.

I have nothing to do with this argument and yet, I was made fun of. This is becomming a pattern. I'm going to tell my mommy/auntie on you guys!

!!!!
I'm so happy this just happened.

[Dirk_Ermen]

Originally posted by Kyle Sloane

What do you call this?

http://cache.rcdb.com/pictures/picmax/p14953.jpg

Heartlining!

On a slightly different note, those footers are far too big (bigger than I thought). Guess that's a scenery fail on my behalf. lol

now this is my kinda thread.=D

[gouldy]

Originally posted by GTzeroH

now this is my kinda thread.=D

...Why?

ehh, well it was