Compared to modern Intamins and B&M's, the transitions are crude and unrefined. The ejector air tosses riders into the brutally designed lap bar. It's an old beast and I love the flavor that Arrow gave to it. They just don't make them like they used to.
Roughness I don't mind. I rather liked the pretzel actually, and the "shitty" banking transition that preceeds it actually makes for a more interesting ride.
New smoother rides FVD designed can give good forces, but always do so more predictably. Still, I like the crude, don't give a love style that went behind Magnum's design, before the actually used a whole lot of calculus to design rides.
Both design styles have their advantages of course, but I think a lot of people don't seem to have an appreciation for the older one. Magnum was caught between two worlds: the old wooden coaster and the modern advanced steel coaster. I think the balance it took was great.
Magnum's little brother, the Gemini, is pretty great too and has numerous similarities to the hyper.
I wouldn't say a ride built like this would get trashed on the modern exchange though. What the real deal is the fact that no one builds Arrow-style rides anymore, or any other old fashioned styles. Everyone nowadays wants to Newton 2 the latest Beemer or Intamin, put in fancy supports, and get good ratings. Though at least the wooden coaster is still a common upload for the exchange, my guess being that manufacturers like GCI are still making a good run for today's standards.