Board index Theme Park Discussions General Theme Park Discussions Cool Idea For New Coaster Type

Cool Idea For New Coaster Type

Discuss anything related to theme parks in general.

Post January 4th, 2011, 1:30 am
cjd

Posts: 3370
Points on hand: 4,718.00 Points
Location: New Concord, OH, USA

I just stumbled onto this on Youtube... pretty cool idea for a new coaster type.


Post January 4th, 2011, 1:38 am

Posts: 2914
Points on hand: 5,657.00 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
that is amazing. At first I just thought it was going to be X, but no! Wonderful
[19:34:14] RideWarriorNation: jim
[19:34:27] RideWarriorNation: can you pls change sig
[19:35:22] Jcoasters: ok
[19:35:39] RideWarriorNation: ty

Post January 4th, 2011, 1:41 am

Posts: 288
Points on hand: 77.00 Points
Location: IL, USA
It looks like the Splitting Coaster type from RCT3-Wild.

Post January 4th, 2011, 1:52 am

Posts: 1908
Points on hand: 232.00 Points
Location: USA
There's another video that gives a closer look as to how it works:

Originally posted by GerstlCrazy:
The more time I spend on this website adds more to the impression that this has become a daycare.

Post January 4th, 2011, 12:04 pm

Posts: 108
Points on hand: 1,415.00 Points
Location: USA


Post January 4th, 2011, 12:38 pm

Posts: 1536
Points on hand: 2,597.00 Points
This could be a whole new way to combine racing coasters and a 4D coaster at a much lower cost. This could be awesome if these would start getting bought.

Post January 4th, 2011, 12:40 pm
Jer User avatar

Posts: 991
Points on hand: 1,089.00 Points
Location: New Jersey

it's a good idea, but it also looks damn expensive.
Phoenix|Maverick|Skyrush|RFII|Leviathan|Bizzaro[SFNE]|Bdash|Griffon|El Toro|Verbolten
RIP Chiller: 1997-2008

Post January 4th, 2011, 1:22 pm

Posts: 2252
Points on hand: 5,889.00 Points
Location: Illinois (SFGAm), USA
Originally posted by neopuma

It looks like the Splitting Coaster type from RCT3-Wild.


Yes, but this version is actually worth building!
American Eagle Lover

Post January 4th, 2011, 1:44 pm

Posts: 814
Points on hand: 290.00 Points
Location: London, United Kingdom

The two tracks joined together is gonna produce some really ugly supports.

Post January 4th, 2011, 1:53 pm

Posts: 346
Points on hand: 1,464.00 Points
Location: Ath, Belgium, Belgium

Post January 4th, 2011, 4:07 pm
Tetsu Premium Member
Premium Member

Posts: 2244
Points on hand: 44.00 Points
Bank: 4,333.00 Points
Location: Winchester, VA
The first video on his YouTube page seems feasible. I would love to see him give more information about the 2 track/1 spine thing because that looks very unfeasible. Time will tell.

Post January 4th, 2011, 4:15 pm
Coasterkidmwm User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 12283
Points on hand: 8,049.10 Points
Bank: 15,000.00 Points
Location: Illinois, USA
Pretty sure Setpoint had this idea like a decade ago at least and nobody bought it.
"Careful man, there's a beverage here!"

Post January 4th, 2011, 4:21 pm

Posts: 414
Points on hand: 35.00 Points

Originally posted by Tetsu

The first video on his YouTube page seems feasible. I would love to see him give more information about the 2 track/1 spine thing because that looks very unfeasible. Time will tell.


Why would this be unfeasible? As long as the vehicles do not connect, it should be pretty easy to build.

Post January 4th, 2011, 4:42 pm

Posts: 2482
Points on hand: 209.00 Points
Bank: 311.00 Points
Location: Switzerland
Official announcement:
X????????? will be renamed to X2 since the real X????????? is this stuff here!

Post January 4th, 2011, 6:13 pm

Posts: 1613
Points on hand: 62.00 Points
I really like the second video of the cars that are facing forward, and not backwards like X2. It creates so many more possibilities. I love the idea of turning the cars face down for a flying coaster twist, roll.. thing. Unfortunately that would mean leg harnesses.
So, my friend came up to me the other day and asked if I wanted a frozen banana, and I said no, but I want a normal banana later, so... yea.

- RIP Mitch Hedberg

Post January 4th, 2011, 8:33 pm

Posts: 2914
Points on hand: 5,657.00 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
Originally posted by Flickstah

I really like the second video of the cars that are facing forward, and not backwards like X2. It creates so many more possibilities. I love the idea of turning the cars face down for a flying coaster twist, roll.. thing. Unfortunately that would mean leg harnesses.


X2 does not have leg harnesses, and it has some parts that are kinda flying position


btw, i would like to see his track type looks very un safe. It would be best to add a triangle spine because triangles an the strongest shape and circles are relatively week. Also, he uses chains to rotate the seats in the Type 2 Design and that seems illogical. The Chains would probably snap a bit into the ride due to pulling a heavy wait. Additionally, The New trains guiding system looks meh. I can't really tell how it works, but it looks like it is not well thought out. Plus, I like the fact that X2 goes backward but his new idea looks way better.
[19:34:14] RideWarriorNation: jim
[19:34:27] RideWarriorNation: can you pls change sig
[19:35:22] Jcoasters: ok
[19:35:39] RideWarriorNation: ty

Post January 4th, 2011, 9:43 pm

Posts: 510
Points on hand: 1,385.00 Points
This looks pretty well thought out, actually. It is the only way to make a safe Mobius coaster. However, I still think it will be almost impossible to heartline this ride properly.
Originally posted by dcs221
\n"they see me trollin', they hatin'..." -Omnigeek6

Chamillionaire you are not...but white and nerdy, yes.

Post January 4th, 2011, 9:51 pm

Posts: 2113
Points on hand: 2,704.00 Points
This guy was at iaapa and had a stand. His idea is actually getting quite a bit of attention by coaster companies.

Post January 4th, 2011, 10:06 pm

Posts: 2252
Points on hand: 5,889.00 Points
Location: Illinois (SFGAm), USA
Originally posted by Jcoasters

btw, i would like to see his track type looks very un safe. It would be best to add a triangle spine because triangles an the strongest shape and circles are relatively week.


If he wanted to do a different track type, he would have to build a model froms scratch. For something that's just an idea, it makes mores sense to just use Coasterdynamix.
American Eagle Lover

Post January 4th, 2011, 10:11 pm

Posts: 2914
Points on hand: 5,657.00 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
Originally posted by Jonny Richey

Originally posted by Jcoasters

btw, i would like to see his track type looks very un safe. It would be best to add a triangle spine because triangles an the strongest shape and circles are relatively week.


If he wanted to do a different track type, he would have to build a model froms scratch. For something that's just an idea, it makes mores sense to just use Coasterdynamix.


i meant his diagrams
[19:34:14] RideWarriorNation: jim
[19:34:27] RideWarriorNation: can you pls change sig
[19:35:22] Jcoasters: ok
[19:35:39] RideWarriorNation: ty

Post January 5th, 2011, 12:08 am
Turbo User avatar
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 3771
Points on hand: 5,516.00 Points
Bank: 21,857.68 Points
Location: WA, USA

Originally posted by Flickstah

I really like the second video of the cars that are facing forward, and not backwards like X2. It creates so many more possibilities. I love the idea of turning the cars face down for a flying coaster twist, roll.. thing. Unfortunately that would mean leg harnesses.
I agree... but i am willing to have leg harnesses if it does everything shown in the vid
Coaster Count: 582 // Top Five: 1. Helix 2. Nemesis 3. Big Bad Wolf 4. Boulder Dash 5. Balder

Coasterkidmwm wrote:
4 G's to the taint was a bit much for me because I'm not a power bottom like Turbo

Post January 5th, 2011, 8:05 am

Posts: 428
Points on hand: 235.00 Points
even in that roll where the seats face upwards, you would still have lots of lats and verts, painful too.


Return to General Theme Park Discussions

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post