Originally posted by atem122
Nananananana Batman(!): The Ride contradicts that statement! If rides like Batty and Nemmie can have huge force and be inverted, I dont see why an inverted hyper wouldn't work.
And Maurer Sohne has actually developed a 2 seater floorless prototype, A113!
Originally posted by coasterpimp
the g's might be too forceful, I'm not saying it wouldn't work, I'm just saying it might work, but it would be pretty cool to see one if it did.
the g's might be too forceful, I'm not saying it wouldn't work, I'm just saying it might work, but it would be pretty cool to see one if it did.
Nananananana Batman(!): The Ride contradicts that statement! If rides like Batty and Nemmie can have huge force and be inverted, I dont see why an inverted hyper wouldn't work.
And Maurer Sohne has actually developed a 2 seater floorless prototype, A113!
Uhhhh, G's and height are not very dependent on each other.
Take a look at Behemoth. That's 230 feet tall, and that probably only pulls 3 - 4 G's. Take a look at Tower of Terror at Gold Reef City in Johannesburg (Prawn Land): That thing has a 164 foot drop but pulls 6.3 G's. Why does it pulls more G's if it's smaller? It's because of the tightness of the pullout in relation to its speed.
A hyper coaster is a hyper coaster, no matter what type of car is used. Be it stand up, Floorless, Inverted, Sit Down, Spinning, or 4D, you can not only make a hyper coaster safe in terms of G forces no matter the type of ride, but also very boring.
Take a look at Wicked Twister. That's technically a hyper invert.