Board index Roller Coaster Games Hard Hat Area Project Katun [Uploaded]

Project Katun [Uploaded]

The Hard Hat Area is the place to post construction news about your ride, so this is the place to hype your future upload!

Post August 9th, 2011, 7:38 am
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
When I work in No Limits, my favourite type is the B&M Invert. This is also reflected in my top-10 steel, from which half is a B&M invert.

Anyways, after my vacation to Italy (trip report will follow soon) I have appreciated Katun even more as one of the best roller coasters in the world.

And since I was out of inspiration as well, I thought it would be a nice challenge to recreate the thing.



Image

At this point the layout is as good as done, though some areas need tweaking.
Last edited by hyyyper on September 25th, 2011, 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Post August 9th, 2011, 8:20 am

Posts: 999
Points on hand: 535.00 Points
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Looks good...except for those God-awful supports but I know they're just to give that feeling of the track being grounded in some way. I have that same feeling with my rides lol. Got any up-close shots of it?
"Don't be a disability"... yep, still keeping that. :P

Post August 9th, 2011, 8:23 am

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
Zero G looks too elongated, Wingover look like the radius on them is too large and doesnt have the flat spot at the top. Whats your total length like?

The B&M trains track nearly perfectly to real life. I have a Talon recreation sitting around thats accurate to 1' (with 1 minor inaccuracy in the flat turn above the station) but other than that, the G's seem to match up perfectly and the pacing is spot on.

So what Im getting at is, yours should be as close to exact as possible! :P

Post August 9th, 2011, 10:10 am

Posts: 918
Points on hand: 905.00 Points
Location: St. Louis, MO, USA

So you going to upload this 'perfect' Talon recreation there Real?

To the topic at hand though, I have to say I am excited to see this. Haven't seen a good recreation of this yet, and I have confidence in you. I have to agree though, the zero-g looks a bit off. Like it rises up, flattens, spins, then goes down again. I'd like to see better angle of (well most of the ride) the flat spins. They look off as well, but very well could be the angle more than anything.

And those supports... Did you even try to make them look right? ;)

Cheers mate. Good work so far.

Post August 10th, 2011, 9:28 pm

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
Iron Man - if someone wants to photograph the entire area around it, get me a topo map and basically does the 3ds. I just don't have it in me anymore to do that stuff. Didn't say it was perfect I was just eluding to the fact that getting track length (on a B&M) along with the other key heights close to actual will make it track like real life too. My Hydra recreation was within a foot or 2 and it had timing and tracking pretty dang close to the real thing.

Testament to Ole's physics.

Post August 11th, 2011, 3:07 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
Hey guys, thanks for the comments. The supports were just to give a better feel for the ride, they will be replace with custom supports once I got the layout and shaping down.

Lengthwise, I'm at 1225 meters while the actual ride is 1200. But I'm working on getting it fixed.

The zero-G is pretty long in real life as well,
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... ANDIA-.JPG

As for the corkscrews, I'm not sure if I got them right, they look like corkscrews, but I'd love some feedback on them.

Here are some shots of the ride:

Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image
Image

Post August 11th, 2011, 4:45 pm

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
No, I think that's a terrible picture of Katun's zero g to go from. I'm trying to find better ones right now

Image

The difference with yours is the length of track between ascending and descending is too great, stretching it out.

Image

Theres also the fact that the spine appears to be flat at the apex of the hill. This means your parabola is off. Trying to quickly replicate it...


Id need shots of Katuns wingovers looking at them from front of back, not the side. That way I can see how the apex is shaped. Most (except one that I know of) wingovers, due to the heartline, the spine flattens at the apex (top)

Post August 11th, 2011, 5:34 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
It's hard to find good pics of the Zero-G-roll, the ones you posted are at an angle, and I can't seem to find anything with the Zero-G roll exactly from the side.

Could I use the ties as a reference, do you know if the spacing is the same in NoLimits as it is in real life?

As for the wingovers/flatspins, I came across this pic that might come in handy:

Image


EDIT: Mine currently looks like this:

Image


So....looks like I've still got some work to do [:)]
Image

Post August 11th, 2011, 6:19 pm

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
The angles I posted are ok if you understand how to decipher them. See, yours dont have that flat angle of attack. And the actual roll itself looks too long.

Im having a brain fart trying to describe what to do though. argh.

Post August 11th, 2011, 6:43 pm

Posts: 943
Points on hand: 1,843.00 Points
Location: United Kingdom

It looks to me like the main problem with the zero g roll is that the entrance/exit is too steep, meaning you had to elongate the top to make the element fit the rest of the layout.

I wouldn't trust ties too much. Sometimes they're affected by where you have your segments. Might be useful to see if you're getting close, but I doubt they'll be exactly the same.

Post August 11th, 2011, 7:04 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
I wish it was so simple. The zero-g is taken so fast that making it shorter on top would probably increase the rotational forces. I will give it a shot though.
Image

Post August 11th, 2011, 7:49 pm

Posts: 2252
Points on hand: 5,889.00 Points
Location: Illinois (SFGAm), USA
The zero g roll is very close, but the wingover looks off. My advice is to save a backup track before playing around with the shaping, or a backup element..... That's what I usually do.

EDIT: after a closer look, try lowering the middle part of the wingover.
American Eagle Lover

Post August 11th, 2011, 7:59 pm

Posts: 943
Points on hand: 1,843.00 Points
Location: United Kingdom

Originally posted by hyyyper

I wish it was so simple. The zero-g is taken so fast that making it shorter on top would probably increase the rotational forces. I will give it a shot though.

If its heartlined around a true parabola rotational forces shouldn't be too great. At the moment you're probably seeing extra lats that are caused by a heartline that doesn't quite experience zero g even if it was unbanked.

Post August 11th, 2011, 11:18 pm

Posts: 2914
Points on hand: 5,657.00 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
Originally posted by hyyyper

The zero-g is taken so fast that making it shorter on top would probably increase the rotational forces.


Tight B&M Inverted Zero G rolls always have high rotational forces.
[19:34:14] RideWarriorNation: jim
[19:34:27] RideWarriorNation: can you pls change sig
[19:35:22] Jcoasters: ok
[19:35:39] RideWarriorNation: ty

Post August 12th, 2011, 4:35 am
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
Originally posted by Wing-Over

Originally posted by hyyyper

I wish it was so simple. The zero-g is taken so fast that making it shorter on top would probably increase the rotational forces. I will give it a shot though.

If its heartlined around a true parabola rotational forces shouldn't be too great. At the moment you're probably seeing extra lats that are caused by a heartline that doesn't quite experience zero g even if it was unbanked.


It is heartlined. The method I used to create it was to first make a hill that had a long time of zero-G at the top. Then I marked the heartline with supports. After that, I applied the banking and moved the track to the heartline would match the heartline of the zero-G hill.

But like I said, I'll give it a try.
Image

Post August 18th, 2011, 9:00 am
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
So, here an onride I took compared to Robb Alvey's POV.

I'm sorry the clip isn't detailed or top quality, but you can see it's pretty well synced.


[youtube]PCggDBEcDJU[/youtube]
Image

Post August 18th, 2011, 11:06 am

Posts: 5286
Points on hand: 3,059.00 Points
Location: USA
Yea, you can see it there with the Zero G.

The real ride levels out sooner and at less of an angle and it exits a lot flatter too. Some elements look spot on, others, off. And timing as a result is off.

Zero G is still the biggest part IMO thats off. The angle entering and exiting is much steeper in yours than it should be. Thats whats producing that weird look I was trying to explain earlier.


Youre on the right path for sure. Not a total overhaul but still a lot of work. Keep at it, no ones really done a really good Katun.

Post August 22nd, 2011, 4:53 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands

Post August 22nd, 2011, 8:34 pm

Posts: 185
Points on hand: 400.00 Points
Location: Carlisle, Ohio, USA
Looks like the pull up that goes into the zero-g is to steep.

Post August 22nd, 2011, 9:49 pm

Posts: 1580
Points on hand: 2,736.00 Points
The trackwork looks pretty bad... while it's synced up for the first half (if it slows down compared to the actual, then speeds up, the scaling is off). You need more of a snap with your wingovers, they ride like the pre-fab you insert from the game. The zero g roll is fairly off too, listen to the advice that Real is providing. I wouldn't start on the scenery quite yet, and try perfecting the track. Maybe try giving Newton a go, you'll never know.
Originally posted by dcs221
\nMack Daddy A113. That'll be your rap name.

Post August 22nd, 2011, 10:53 pm

Posts: 6124
Points on hand: 10,012.00 Points
Location: Minnesota, USA
Awww, it's just awful. [:(] Katun looks awesome too Hyyypskees. You should give it a few full-on attempts.

Post August 23rd, 2011, 4:42 am
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
The track was worked on after the comments on the video, and after that I have stopped working on it because basically, this is as good as it gets for me. I could try and improve it to make it glass-smooth or synced up perfectly. But that is something I do not like to do and it would also cost me a lot of time for just a tiny bit of improvement.
I am no NL-pro, but even though the track isn't perfect, it is my smoothest ride yet, so I am pretty happy with it.
Image

Post September 4th, 2011, 4:13 pm
hyyyper User avatar
True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 8705
Points on hand: 9,207.00 Points
Location: The Netherlands
This might be the last update in a while. School is starting tomorrow, so I will have less time to work on this.

So, at this point the track and 3d-objects are done. I still need to touch up some supports and add flanges.
After that, it's adding some trees and a cartexture and it'll be finished.


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image


Image
Image

Post September 4th, 2011, 4:39 pm

Posts: 2113
Points on hand: 2,704.00 Points

Post September 4th, 2011, 5:17 pm

Posts: 943
Points on hand: 1,843.00 Points
Location: United Kingdom

Paths and station area look great, but you really need to turn down the repeats on the grass and make it a bit darker, it looks way too bright against the track.

Next

Return to Hard Hat Area

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post