Board index Roller Coaster Games Hard Hat Area NEW: Intamin STRATA !!

NEW: Intamin STRATA !!

The Hard Hat Area is the place to post construction news about your ride, so this is the place to hype your future upload!

Post September 14th, 2012, 1:46 am

Posts: 361
Points on hand: 6,842.00 Points
Location: NV, USA
So i have a quick question, im in the process of constructing a monster intamin STRATA that stands 420ft in the air...my question is how should i go about supporting this beast?? The I305/SkyRush way or the MilleniumForce way??
Last edited by DechLave on September 14th, 2012, 2:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Post September 14th, 2012, 1:55 am

Posts: 361
Points on hand: 6,842.00 Points
Location: NV, USA
im trying to upload pics but its not letting...or i just donr know how on m
my new laptop .
--bare with me

Post September 14th, 2012, 2:16 am
RideWarriorNation User avatar
Beta Tester
Beta Tester

Posts: 1447
Points on hand: 1,533.40 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
400'+ is a strata coaster, and since you aren't using the new spine model support it the MF way

Post September 14th, 2012, 2:32 am

Posts: 361
Points on hand: 6,842.00 Points
Location: NV, USA
oh poop, you right 400ft + is a strata... im just so use to doing coasters that usually 250ft-300ft ... thank you

Post September 14th, 2012, 2:37 am

Posts: 361
Points on hand: 6,842.00 Points
Location: NV, USA
personal opinion, do you think the "new" spine would be benefical to a strata thats in the form of a traditional(mega/giga) coaster ?

Post September 14th, 2012, 11:14 am
cjd

Posts: 3370
Points on hand: 4,718.00 Points
Location: New Concord, OH, USA

I personally like the look of the classic MF-style supports, but really in the end it just comes down to a matter of personal opinion on your part.

If you really want to go for accuracy, then look at the layout. If it's more about big hills and has overbanked turns, then probably MF-style supports would be more appropriate. If it has lots of ground turns, quick transitions, and short hills with lots of ejector airtime, then I305 supports would probably be more appropriate.

Post September 14th, 2012, 12:34 pm

Posts: 1241
Points on hand: 95.00 Points
Bank: 2,503.00 Points
Location: Kentucky
You could try like a weird hybrid or something. i305 spine, but with little clusters of MF-style supports placed very far apart. That way it would seem more like a new coaster and still have a seemingly good structural rigidity.

Post September 14th, 2012, 7:59 pm

Posts: 1928
Points on hand: 1,601.00 Points
Location: OH, USA
With a 400-foot lift hill, you're probably going to need more than the "traditional" 2 support structures if you're supporting it with I305-style trusses, only because it has so much more horizontal space to cover. If you use MF-style towers, then there really is no "normal" way to do it and thus any number of structures (spaced appropriately, of course) would work.

I'm envisioning the "hybrid" structure that's been mentioned, and I can't really see any way to make it look good [lol]. But of course, "looking good" is both a matter of taste and rather unimportant in the world of structures.

Post September 15th, 2012, 8:09 am
mkingy User avatar
Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 5462
Points on hand: 28,111.00 Points
Bank: 0.00 Points
Location: United Kingdom
Try telling that to the UK power grid who wanted to make our pylons look more asthetic. Cue loads of archetects coming up with ideas that either wouldn't work or would be incredibly expensive.

I think Hybrid would be the way to go :)
Coaster Count - 198
France 2019 Mini Trip Report

Post September 17th, 2012, 9:30 pm

Posts: 361
Points on hand: 6,842.00 Points
Location: NV, USA
thank you ! your guys input is very well appreciated ... but im still having trouble figuring out how to upload on this new laptop of mine... but im going the MF route


Return to Hard Hat Area

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post
cron