Much as I don't care, I'd argue against that point Jake...I think "topper track" coasters are more hybrid than wood coasters with steel supports.
Consider these points:
*The most generally accepted ideas is the important part of the ride when categorizing is the track itself.
*New topper track coasters (looking at Outlaw Run) use 6 layers of wood in their track.
*Topper track coasters use a rectangular section of steel on top of the wood.
*Steel coasters generally use tubular track, but nothing says a steel rail must be round...there are other styles, like say the I beam shaped Thrust Air coaster rails.
*So, 1/4 of the track is effectively the same as a steel coaster.
*Yes there's some kind of mix inside the rails, but there may be a mix inside rails of B&M coasters in areas with noise restrictions (not sure the exact location of this mix, whether it fills the rails, spine, or even supports...feel free to correct me there). Yet, nobody calls these B&Ms by the material that fills the track.
*So anyways, the word "hybrid" does not have a limit as to how much or little of either material makes up a track section, other than to say if it's say 6-8 layers of wood and a flat steel strip then it's a wooden coaster. Therefore, I'd say topper track would most accurately be called a hybrid coaster. For all the arguments about say Colossus, I think it would suffice to say it's a wooden coaster with hybrid sections.
But with all that said, classifications are completely pointless IMO...what matters is the ride experience.
Anddd that's just my opinion, take it or leave it...don't care enough to write more given how insignificant I think it is lol
...