She's fired obviously

gforce1994 wrote:

Jakizle wrote:

^What if the warning signs weren't put up yet? That could be a way around it. Who knows though.

And I just reposted the picture from another source. I didn't look that sh*t up!

At Kings Island, I heard from friends that it is part of their contract to not film videos of rides for self gain. She's done.

It got removed after several thousand saw it.

gforce1994 wrote:

Jakizle wrote:

^What if the warning signs weren't put up yet? That could be a way around it. Who knows though.

And I just reposted the picture from another source. I didn't look that sh*t up!

At Kings Island, I heard from friends that it is part of their contract to not film videos of rides for self gain. She's done.

I imagine that's pretty standard stuff for employment at any of the parks.

Coasterkidmwm wrote:

You seriously found it necessary to find and then put up that picture?

Yes because of the immense hotness!

Why does it matter so much?

[mkingy]

People are jealous she's already ridden it and rubbing it in their faces.

gforce1994 wrote:

Jakizle wrote:

^What if the warning signs weren't put up yet? That could be a way around it. Who knows though.

And I just reposted the picture from another source. I didn't look that sh*t up!

At Kings Island, I heard from friends that it is part of their contract to not film videos of rides for self gain. She's done.

Someone bought the rights (Same situation as GateKeeper) for first POV and off-ride. I have seen people get fired at CP for filming during rides. Even during employee ride nights.

mkingy wrote:

People are jealous she's already ridden it and rubbing it in their faces.

By getting fired, breaking contracts, and breaking the law.

CKidd wrote:

Why does it matter so much?

Because a park employee broke a park rule for self promotion.

Which I am sure happens in every single park every single year. I just dont see the point in going on about it though, at least not unless you personally know the person involved, in which case its still not really appropriate to emphasize her getting fired every other post.

CKidd wrote:

Which I am sure happens in every single park every single year. I just dont see the point in going on about it though, at least not unless you personally know the person involved, in which case its still not really appropriate to emphasize her getting fired every other post.

I don't know anyone involved in this situation. I just found the whole situation bizarre due to a). new ride, b). the person made no attempt to hide the ID of the YouTube Poster, and C). KI I know for a fact is usually on the top of their game with employees trying to make videos.

If you don't care, then you don't have to post in this thread.

It's a good example of how rules are rules and they should be followed.

Jakizle wrote:

If you don't care, then you don't have to post in this thread.

It's a good example of how rules are rules and they should be followed.

At least there is a good moral to this saga.
In other news, I bet the POV released by the park is a billion times better. Ironic if they caught someone filming while making the B-roll.

[mkingy]

gforce1994 wrote:

Jakizle wrote:

If you don't care, then you don't have to post in this thread.

It's a good example of how rules are rules and they should be followed.

At least there is a good moral to this saga.
In other news, I bet the POV released by the park is a billion times better. Ironic if they caught someone filming while making the B-roll.

I don't imagine its hard to beat a POV from a few rows back with over half the screen filled with the back of the seat infront

mkingy wrote:

gforce1994 wrote:

Jakizle wrote:

If you don't care, then you don't have to post in this thread.

It's a good example of how rules are rules and they should be followed.

At least there is a good moral to this saga.
In other news, I bet the POV released by the park is a billion times better. Ironic if they caught someone filming while making the B-roll.

I don't imagine its hard to beat a POV from a few rows back with over half the screen filled with the back of the seat infront

The official one was a bazillion times better. Couple of snap transitions spotted.