Explanation?

[gouldy]

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=4506

Comment By BlueSlushy888 on 08/13/2004
Ok if you trying to make dragster supports thoose sucked but if you werent trying to make dragster supports then they were good. It was a smoooth ride I liked the whole thing.
Technical: 6.5 Adrenaline: 7.5 Originality/Acc.: 6 Average: 6.67

I'm not necessarily complaining here, but really this user needs to reconsider the way they rate rides. I have seen some of this users ratings on other rides and to be honest they are never very well explained, but this one kinda takes the piss "I like the whole thing" and then he gives it a 6.67 [confused] Is anyone else just slightly confused as to where he got a 6.67 from "I liked the whole thing".....because to be honest I really don't see where that came from

Also, I don't know if anybody else has noticed, but I think there is a lot more unexplained or just generally poor ratings starting to appear on here in the last few months or so. Surely people need to learn that the whole point of rating a ride, is to give the builder tips and pointers on how they can improve it and I'm sorry but "I liked the whole thing" doesn't tell me why he thinks its only an average coaster does it really.

I don't think his rating should be deleted, as it averages out the over rates aswell, but what I am suggesting is that people take note and actually begin to explain their ratings, it kinda annoys me when people rate coasters like that, because they might aswell have not rated it at all. Ahwell, mini rant over.....just wanted to get my views out there [:)]

Staff are working on ways to improve ratings and award those who give detailed explanations [;)]

Anyways fixed