tiepilot35 wrote:
Paradox your view on the ride still appalls me and it makes me think you're being intentionally biased against it since there exists something else to, for whatever reason, compare it to. You are certainly entitled to your own opinion but I just cannot fathom a worldview where this roller coaster seems "gimmicky" and that most of the ride "doesn't matter". And I also can't at all see how this is wasted potential. Can you imagine how much careful design, manufacturing, and destruction/construction they had to execute for this? It would certainly cost overall more than the New Texas Giant did, but which layout is much observably longer and stronger? This one's. Had they used the rest of the supportage from the original Colossus and used all the "potential" you think they could have, it would be a mammoth project that would cost Six Flags Inc far too much money for what it would be worth. The ride time is already two and a half minutes at least, as it is.
Thank you for respecting my opinion. I guess you are right with the bias aspect as I really thought that RMC would make my pipe dream coaster with this. I'm not saying TC is gimmicky, but I was mainly bashing at Full Throttle. If SFMM had more money, then I think they could have built more and possibly made a layout that resembles the original much better than this does.
I will be riding it in August and I am extremely excited. After watching all of the testing my opinion has changed a lot and the reason I am hesitating to accept the fact that this might be better than WC is that I am extremely biased to SFNE because it is my homepark and I want them to be the best even though I know they are far from it.