Board index Public Relations Post All Complaints Here Chaos,weird comment

Chaos,weird comment

Report complaints problems here with links to them. No links, no fixing them then.

Post February 25th, 2004, 4:29 pm

Posts: 394
Points on hand: 4,163.00 Points
Location: New Jersey, NJ, USA

I know you probably think im complaining just because its my track but im truly not, coaster992001 made a few weird comments on my ride like saying that the supports would cost too much in real life and they were unrealistic, he also ssaid that he saw red G's when on mine, after testing it a bunch of times i never saw red G's. I just thought that it was a weird thing to say, and i dont know how i have no red G's and he does.So no offense to coaster992001 about his rating or ne thing, i just find it weird.

Chaos: http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=3257
Last edited by eZe7789 on February 25th, 2004, 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post February 25th, 2004, 4:40 pm

Posts: 357
Points on hand: 2,149.00 Points
I have heard this before...people get different g's. Set your g limits higher, and his comment about supports is fine. Those supports were unrealistic. So I think his rating was well explained (plus, its not too bad at all of a review) and it should stay

Post February 25th, 2004, 4:42 pm

Posts: 1620
Points on hand: 4,230.00 Points
Location: USA
im not taking offense to anything, but there were red negative g's on the top of the first camel-back after the forst drop. as for my comments about the supports, yes they are cool- looking but there is just too much of them! i would expect that many supports to go on a coaster 3 x that size. they just seemed very very out of place. and considering you put the coaster under the "realistic" category, i felt that in real life, they'd be waaay to expensive for a park to build considering the coaster size. i think a park would opt to build a coaster with supports to a scale that fits the coaster.. i hope that makes sence lol[:)]

Post February 25th, 2004, 4:58 pm

Posts: 342
Points on hand: 5,840.00 Points
Location: New Jersey, NJ, USA
I think the comment about the supports is kinda dumb. I mean just look at Primier coasters like Batman & Robin: the Chiller! That thing is a huge mess of supports!

Post February 25th, 2004, 5:05 pm

Posts: 1620
Points on hand: 4,230.00 Points
Location: USA
yes, but they're all nessecery. and that's 2 tracks interlocking, of course there's going to be a ton of supports!

Post February 25th, 2004, 6:35 pm

Posts: 303
Points on hand: 4,190.00 Points
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

Here's an idea for an easy way to figure this out: - go look up the costs of steel I beams, poles, concrete footers, and the time/fuel for torches it takes to weld them together. Then come and give a report of how expensive it is. Look up the number of poles, & all nodes (free, track, fundamental). Approximate the average length of things and add it up. (don't forget to pay the welders)

Bottom line - I didn't look at this coaster, so I'm not on anyone's side...but it seems to me to be a stupid argument unless you can back it up. ON BOTH SIDES!!!!

Post February 25th, 2004, 8:14 pm

Posts: 1536
Points on hand: 2,083.00 Points
Location: Etobicoke(Toronto), Is Ontario a state?, Canada

just to comment it would cost alot considering all the time,and shipping it probly cost around what 50 times amillion costs or so roughly[:)]

Post February 25th, 2004, 9:03 pm
Kev True Addicts
True Addicts

Posts: 1006
Points on hand: 3,347.00 Points
Location: Oklahoma, USA
Geez, you guys really know how to suck the fun out of a computer game. [:P] Topic closed. If you would like to continue the discussion, then start a new thread in the NL forum.


Return to Post All Complaints Here

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post