Underrate, purposeful no less

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=7567

A petty underrate by Matt. I don't care how he words it, this is a typical underrate for the rate he received here:

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=7593

His comments are unsupported, and most certainly mean absolutely nothing. Read this, just read it and tell me if his comments are even remotely supported by his rating.

Comment By Matt on 06/05/2005
Techincal : The ride was not perfect, i do talk about other stuff than trackwork in the technical part. Where are the rails on the drop? Overbanking turns were abit undersupported too. The ride was very smooth and pumpless, thats what you get for using a machine I would of also liked to have seen some terraforming as this can add to a ride so much, i think everybody under-estimates this factor far too much. Exploit it before they all do.

Adrenaline : The ride did have a good pace but it was very repetitive,repetitive,repetitive,repetitive. You get the idea.

Originality : Nothing new here really.
Technical: 8.5 Adrenaline: 5 Originality/Acc.: 6 Average: 6.50

Yeah, I didn't think so either, hence the reporting. It is BS and we all know it.

The rating looks fine to me. He gave you 8.5 for the tech which is pretty high up there and marked down for the same thing everyone else did.

Rating stays, sorry for the lateness.