CLEAR LOWRATE!!!!

1Write Your Own Review
Comment By Tyler on 12/30/2004
Frankly this ride felt very rushed.

T: Lots of problems here, lots of excessive lateral G's. This thing would be a major headbanger. You're using wheels on the midcourse break run, that's bad. Lots of pumping and poor transistions.

A: Starts off good, but it's short and the ending is lame.

O: Pretty good, +1 for objects. Nothing groundbreaking.
Technical: 2 Adrenaline: 4 Originality/Acc.: 6 Average: 4.00

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=6345

????????? Appart to be lowrate, is ridicoulous a rate of 2 on technical on this coaster. Ok have lateral g forces and could run with 2 trains. Have pumping, but thats for a 2? o poop, dont make me rate with a 2 the coasters with good technical, because then i should start rate with -5 the bad coasters!!!!

????????? Adrenaline, more lame is your explanation here. Same as original.

You can see is an intention rate, because when he rated my coaster was about 7.7 and his bad-built-woody (with a full 10 in a rate) was 7.8!!!!!!!!! poop this man is making me feel very angry!!!

Now compare his dumbass rate with the rest of the rates at my coaster

The fact that you are calling any member on this site a dumbass says enough. Also I agree Tyler's technical score is on the low side, but I can see his point.
If you still have problems with this rating, ask Tyler (friendly) for a more clear explaination and maybe suggest a subtle change of the technical score. IMO the rating has been explained enough, period.

Case closed. Topic locked.