Originally posted by RealOriginally posted by The Edge
I guess it is a shame really, i do admit he was a good designer like Real. However Real as said in one his posts, he knows that he is well known and people enjoy his tracks, so he did the decent thing to do and share them around, i guess it was just a case of someone not getting what they wanted
However lately I have become quite agitated with people rating down because I use tools. Frankly, I never knew that Building Technique was based on the PROCESS it took to build the ride, instead of the END RESULT of the ride.
It really makes me question why people rate and why people download. Also makes me question whether or not I feel like making anymore rides.
And this is TOTALLY not specific to this site. CS and another site are having the same issues and I was hoping one site would not but eh, oh well. I wont lose any sleep over it.
Its just really sad that people now rate on how you made the ride rather than the rides final design. Simply an amazing concept really.
[/quote
Well I kind of go both ways with this, one who spends many hours (50+) and achieves a rate of 9, cant be compared to a coaster that was created in 10 hours using tools and that got the same rating. It just aint fair, and I know life aint, believe me, I would know, but in cases like this were it can be made fair, it should. So perhaps there being a tool used section and hand-made section. IDK, but something must be done. No hard feelings to tool users, I have nothing against them, but I would say its not fair to compare a tool-oriented coaster to a hand-made coaster of the same rating, wouldnt you think that too?