Bad ratings from coasterhunk

Coasterhunk has been posting a lot of poorly explained rates lately.

For instance:

http://coastercrazy.com/track_exchange/de ... p?tid=7257

This ride was underbanked and very rough. You obviously used the tool on this ride and should have hand banked some of your tunrarounds. The vertical G's were also very high.

http://coastercrazy.com/track_exchange/de ... p?tid=7277

This ride was fun, but wasn't all that origonal. The layout was smooth and the spped was OK, but it really slowed at the end. OK ride.

Those are just two examples. Both scores were well below averages for the rides.

I was about to create a thread when I saw one was here:

http://coastercrazy.com/track_exchange/de ... p?tid=7257
Coasterhunk ...
This ride was underbanked and very rough. You obviously used the tool on this ride and should have hand banked some of your tunrarounds. The vertical G's were also very high.
Technical: 6 Adrenaline: 6.5 Originality/Acc.: 6 Average: 6.17

I'm sorry, but that isn't even remotely justified - especially with his public and expressed hatred of me - and I think his words were, "you need to get a life". I've asked him not to rate my rides to avoid controversy ... and yet, here we go. I think we all know this rate means nothing.

And yeah, I am being VERY controlled right now.
NO PMs are coming from me to him ... but they could be composed quick.

Anyway, I do find it odd to be seeing rates from someone who has not posted in ANY forum, and has posted ZERO coasters of his own -- and yet he seems only capable of writing two lines of unjustified crap, well below the quorem average. Odd, isn't it?

He should be shot

Yeah i have seen he is making some bad rates. He rated my match up contest track, but he didnt rate too bad on that. Althoguh he did say it was very bumpy throughout the ride, when i know its only the last section after the MCBR which was the main problem. but he didnt really underate so im okay [:D]

while it's true that he could explain his ratings better, the numbers are not that far off. The rating on TConwell's track was deleted, (the comment made no sense), but the explaination on Tyler's track was sufficient enough to stay. (barely)