Board index Public Relations Post All Complaints Here Javixxxx, yet again

Javixxxx, yet again

Report complaints problems here with links to them. No links, no fixing them then.

Post May 2nd, 2005, 10:18 am

Posts: 688
Points on hand: 4,164.00 Points
http://coastercrazy.com/track_exchange/ ... p?tid=7381

Yet another crappy Javixxx rate. Although I have no idea of most of what he says, he is making stuff up again. He claims it hits -1.6, when it goes no higher than -1.4, although really both values while strong. As for the rest of the rate, your guess is as good mine. I've asked him MANY times in the past to rate my rides in English or not at all. I think it is rather rude on his part to continue with these rates, espeically since his english is not that bad, certainly far better than any of the online translators. Also, note how he only bothers to rate my rides, and never rates anyone elses. It seems the only conclusion I can draw based on the fact that his rates are always at least a point or two lower than others (And I'm talking about guys like IntaminFan and TConwell who know their stuff) that he is doing this to lower the scores on my ride as some sort of personal vendetta. Hardly sporting behavior. With that said, I am requesting the he no longer rates my rides.

T: this nothing badly, the backups are good and it less original. There is something of pumping, especially in the inversion despues of the loop, and some lateral turns with algun pothole as is frequent, but nothing but that that. Quizas the worse thing since my point of view is the airtime, -1.6 seems me excessive (if, go him, come, you complain you as is common lol), but is my opinion, above all when podria to have been solved with a little effort. There is a pair of backups that are not too good, since the upper zone that holds is them too long, and as consequence, unstable. Quizas varying the type of backup podrias to have solved that problem.

To: Quizas be the limp point of your coaster, the principle is = that all your coasters, somewhat repetitive. Does not it catch sufficient velocity, although this nearby one, and the thrilling this well but does not pass from that. We go, that although have good velocity and algun good I turn, needs but intensity and but force g in some points, and less force g in other, al less since my opinion

Or: Pretty lift and tunel, facts surely with some tool, but the result remains quite bright. By it demas, a layout tipico of this type of coaster, quizas podrias to vary algun element, or tematizar what refers to setting a little but. Nothing but that to add.

Post May 2nd, 2005, 10:29 am

Posts: 735
Points on hand: 1.00 Points
Location: Spain
He claims it hits -1.6, when it goes no higher than -1.4,

Hmmm got this airtime at the back seat , after reaching the highest part of an airtime.

And about english, you can be sure that people wanted to kill me (well, today they continue lol, but a bit less) , because wn i rate en english it seems my comments where more destructive, this is why i rate in spanish, to make softer rates and better explained

And about i only rate your rides, you're lying. I think im here enought time and people see i rate most of the tracks, but i always start from the top 5 because those tracks are supposed to have more quality and be better.

And in addition:
Comment By Tyler on 05/02/2005
Well, I'm kinda torn on this. On the one hand, it's a well above average, but not perfect recreation. On the other hand, it's Son of Beast, one of the most stupid, boring, meandering rides ever built...
Technical: 7.5 Adrenaline: 2.5 Originality/Acc.: 9 Average: 6.33
http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=7376

CAn i ask you why you rate 2.5 a coaster at adrenalien when the rest got at least 8.5 ? ok, if is not too good, i can understand rates whit a 5, or a 6, but 2.5 it seems really a lowrate imo... and also very well thought strategy Tyler specially when the track is A RECREATION [;)]

Post May 2nd, 2005, 11:33 am
cjd

Posts: 3370
Points on hand: 4,718.00 Points
Location: New Concord, OH, USA

This is not a bad rate. Javixxxxx explained himself plenty well, and the numbers were hardly low. Chill, Tyler. This coaster still has an 8.08 rating, and there will surely be other ratings. DjJavixxxxx is a critical rater, and he isn't even half as picky as some of the raters on Coastersims. Bottom line: the rating stays, and there is no problem here. Please don't be so sensitive about your coasters. One of the rules of life is that you can't please everyone.


Return to Post All Complaints Here

 


  • Related topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post