Bad Rating

take a look to the rating of Intaminfan397...

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... p?tid=7330

wel, the comment is all right but What doesn't seems to be honest is the rating of adrenaline. A 0.5 for adrenaline on a strata coaster is impossible I think. For originallity wel... 0.5 does not seems to be good. He sais it is a copy of TTD (exept the drop) But that is not coorect beaucause if he checked it out, he should have seen my coaster is 150 meters high and not 128 meters.
and please, a 1 for technical. It was my first strata-coaster and when you go up, that does not happen whit a lagre bump. But what bothers me the most is that rating for adrenaline.

Just because the height is different doesn't mean the layout isn't the same. What if I made Kingda Ka slightly larger, then I uploaded it as my own creation? It still would just be a copy of Kingda Ka, but larger.

If you make a rocket coaster, don't JUST make a tophat. I think most people will agree that rocket coasters with just a tophat in NL aren't interesting at all.

I gave it the low ratings I did because for such a bad design it was in the first place, it was executed very poorly. If the same trackwork was done on a more creative layout, the track would've earned higher points.