Originally posted by GavG
4) Nothing is allowed to touch the creek or the brown marshy land around the creek, the creek and marsh land may not be altered either. Think bridges.
What about supports for paths / coasters? I know it's possible to avoid that they touch the ground, but it will hardly look any realistic...
Which leads me to my next question:
Originally posted by GavG
JUDGING
T: Flow of the rides, path layout, does the scenery make sense? Etc.
A: Height/speed of rides, popularity of rides, overall experience, etc.
O/Acc: Designer accuracy, original elements, scenery layout, etc.
So realism is no criterion? Will parks that are crammed with exciting and original rides be preferred to realistic looking, "moderate" parks? Will points be deducted if there's no 120+ ft coaster?
These questions are not meant to be judging (as they may sound), I'm just wondering what kind of park we should build. More generally asked:
Are we looking for a fantasy or realistic mini park? Or is this each designer's own choice?