Mikey wrote:
While this sounds like a solution that would be easy to implement, ride computers are not like your home PC. Think of a ride computer as a giant calculator. It's very good at giving you correct data reliably so long as the inputs are correct, but if you take the battery out, use the clear button then all the data you just entered is lost. PLCs are very simpleton, they have no persistent storage outside of a flash card that a working program is written. The PLC cannot write to this card, but it can output data to a separate storage for logging but it can't ready back data from the system it outputs to.
PLCs use lader logic as a programing language. The program is stored in flash and loaded when the PLC_START function is called. When a safe stop needs to occur, a PLC_STOP function is called. This unloads all data from memory. By default if power is removed, the PLC reverts to PLC_STOP until PLC_START is called in a start up sequence. There is no way to preserve the set values once a reset has commenced. You can only check against the existing values you have at start up.
I know this sounds like a limitation, but these controllers are designed to handled millions of cycles and do so with out fault or error. They have been trusted in service for over 35 years.
While I understand where you're coming from, and respect your experience in the industry and knowledge of these topics, I think this might be a sign that its time to update these systems. Let's face it, when an accident happens in the airline industry, measures are taken to ensure that the same problem never happens again, for instance when a hornet made a nest in a Pitot tube of an airline, causing the pilot to get faulty readings and crash the plane, the co-pilot was getting accurate readings from his own tube. This made it standard to not only install several more redundant tubes to future airlines, but make it so the crew could choose exactly which tubes' readings to display in the cabin.
While this kind of accident is unique, unless measures are implemented to prevent it happening again, probability states that it WILL happen again, maybe not in this decade or the next, but again nonetheless. Using another airline example, just look up the cargo door issue on DC-10s.
I'm not trying to be alarmist, but rides are getting more and more complex in terms of components and number of trains, and issues like this are sure to arise again. You've seen how panicked this has caused the public to be about ride safety, and it is clear that they hold the amusement industry to a MUCH higher standard than pretty much any other. Hell, tens of thousands of people die on the road in the US alone every year, and yet the one major accident in amusement parks this year which i can name, which resulted in no fatalities, has the public in an uproar demanding the ride be torn down. Instead of calling them panicked and unreasonable (which they might be), I think it's entirely possible to meet the standards which they put up, and to be honest I think that would be better for everyone.
Boulder Dash was the only good roller coaster.
"or if you're when the hydraulic fluid was dumped out of the motor is goes 200ft up the tower and is like "LOL nope"" - CKMWM 2016