Bad Rate on Mountain Thunder

http://www.coastercrazy.com/track_exchang ... ?tid=12487

Valleyfair's rating on Mountain Thunder seems too vague and opinionated. I know - rates are opinions. But to say one didn't like a ride and rate it down for that? I'd say, don't rate it at all. There are lots of submitted rides I don't particularly care for, but I don't rate them - BECAUSE I didn't like them. (of course, I like some I never get around to rating....). Anyway, comments like "boring", "too long", up and down (isn't that what coasters do?).... My Mercury coaster had a rate deleted because the rater loved it and rated it high and someone requested that the rate be deleted because nothing specific was said about Mercury. While a little more was said about this one, it still seems like a useless rating. I think all 3 categories were too low for the ride, especially in comparison to other rates for Mountain Thunder and for other rides on the site.

Thanks for considering.

[Oscar]

while I agree the ratng should be removed, I disagree with your argument. If one does not like a roller coaster one should tell the author why not. That is how one can learn why certain user did not like it and maybe you can build something in the future that user and his group alike may like.